What was the court's CONCLUSION (holding,decision) in the Helena Chemical Co v Williamson case?Multiple choice question.For Helena Chemical. The limitation of remedies provision was in good faith and fair between the parties.For WIlliamson. Limitations of remedies provision fails of its essential purpose and he is not prevented from receiving consequential damages.For Helena Chemical. Williamson breached the contract based on the unambiguous language in the remedies and default sectionFor Helena Chemical. Limitation of remedies provision fails of its essential purpose so it is not prevented from receiving foreseeable damages.

What was the main ISSUE (legal question) in the Helena Chemical Co v Williamson case?Multiple choice question.Was the warning and remedies limitation in compliance with Section 1 of the UCC regarding font size?Was the agreement Williamson signed with Helena an unconscionable limitation of remedies?Was the agreement Williamson signed with Helena clear and unambiguous?Were the charges Helena invoiced Williamson for in the agreement beyond the market prices?

When a limitation on a buyer's remedies on breach by a seller is unconscionable, the __________.Multiple choice question.court has the right to charge cases on the seller for causing emotional damages.buyer will be sued for using the remedies.buyer has all the rights given to an injured buyer under the UCC.court will enforce the limitation.

What RULE (law) did the court follow in the Townsend Ford v Hinds Ford case? (Choose TWO correct answers)Multiple select question.Five elements: binding contract, non-breaching party performed, other party did not perform, meeting of the minds, breaching party incured damages.Four elements for binding contract: offer, acceptance, meeting of the minds, just consideration, certainty as to essential terms.Four elements for breach: binding contract, non-breaching party performed, other party failed to perform, nonbreaching party suffered damages.Four elements for binding contract: offer, acceptance, meeting of the minds, consideration, certainty as to essential terms.

Only litigants who are directly or adversely affected by a disputed action have the right, otherwise known as __________, to bring the case to courtGroup of answer choicessubstantive due processstandingthe Madison Doctrinethe Marbury Doctrine

What RULE (law) did the court follow in the Townsend Ford v Hinds Ford case? (Choose TWO correct answers)Multiple select question.Four elements for breach: binding contract, non-breaching party performed, other party failed to perform, nonbreaching party suffered damages.Five elements: binding contract, non-breaching party performed, other party did not perform, meeting of the minds, breaching party incured damages.Four elements for binding contract: offer, acceptance, meeting of the minds, consideration, certainty as to essential terms.Four elements for binding contract: offer, acceptance, meeting of the minds, just consideration, certainty as to essential terms.