Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Asarta Inc. is polluting into a nearby fishing stream; doing so benefits them $40,000 a year. The fishermen are unhappy as their trout are dying off. Typically, the fishermen can catch trout and sell it to a local market where they can earn about $8,000 a year. Currently, Asarta Inc. has the rights to use the stream as they see fit. Which of the following is an optimal solution according to the Coase Theorem?Multiple ChoiceAsarta Inc. could pay the fishermen $7,000 and keep polluting.Asarta Inc. could pay the fishermen $8,500 and keep polluting.The fishermen could pay Asarta Inc. $4,000 to stop them from polluting.There is no optimal solution given the current property rights.

Question

Asarta Inc. is polluting into a nearby fishing stream; doing so benefits them 40,000ayear.Thefishermenareunhappyastheirtroutaredyingoff.Typically,thefishermencancatchtroutandsellittoalocalmarketwheretheycanearnabout40,000 a year. The fishermen are unhappy as their trout are dying off. Typically, the fishermen can catch trout and sell it to a local market where they can earn about 8,000 a year. Currently, Asarta Inc. has the rights to use the stream as they see fit. Which of the following is an optimal solution according to the Coase Theorem?Multiple ChoiceAsarta Inc. could pay the fishermen 7,000andkeeppolluting.AsartaInc.couldpaythefishermen7,000 and keep polluting.Asarta Inc. could pay the fishermen 8,500 and keep polluting.The fishermen could pay Asarta Inc. $4,000 to stop them from polluting.There is no optimal solution given the current property rights.

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The Coase Theorem suggests that as long as property rights are clearly defined, bargaining will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation of property rights. In this case, Asarta Inc. has the rights to the stream and it benefits them 40,000ayeartopolluteit.Thefishermen,ontheotherhand,arelosing40,000 a year to pollute it. The fishermen, on the other hand, are losing 8,000 a year due to the pollution.

The optimal solution, according to the Coase Theorem, would be for the party that values the resource the most to end up with it. In this case, Asarta Inc. values the stream more (40,000vs40,000 vs 8,000). Therefore, the optimal solution would be for Asarta Inc. to compensate the fishermen for their loss.

Looking at the options, the one that makes the most sense is "Asarta Inc. could pay the fishermen 8,500andkeeppolluting."Thisway,thefishermenarecompensatedfortheirlossandevengetabitmore.AsartaInc.stillbenefitsbecausethecosttothem(8,500 and keep polluting." This way, the fishermen are compensated for their loss and even get a bit more. Asarta Inc. still benefits because the cost to them (8,500) is less than the benefit they get from polluting the stream ($40,000).

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

Select all that applyHow have farmers, tribal members, and recreational and commercial fisheries agreed to manage water on the Klamath River?Multiple select question.Farmers will let some of their land go fallow in extra dry years and instead try to grow high-value crops on a smaller part of their land.They will pump groundwater and move those waters into the river to support healthy fish populations.Farmers agreed to use less water in exchange for funds to finance water conser

Which two of the following government policies designed to limit the size of fish catches to sustainable levels have generally been effective in reaching that goal?Multiple select question.Issuing individual transferable quotas (ITQs)Limiting the number of fishing boats allowed to fish in a specific areaLimiting the number of days that a certain species of fish can be caughtLimiting fish catch sizes to a total allowable catch (TAC)

Multiple Select QuestionSelect all that applyWhich two of the following government policies designed to limit the size of fish catches to sustainable levels have generally been effective in reaching that goal?Multiple select question.Issuing individual transferable quotas (ITQs)Limiting the number of fishing boats allowed to fish in a specific areaLimiting the number of days that a certain species of fish can be caughtLimiting fish catch sizes to a total allowable catch (TAC)

Multiple Select QuestionSelect all that applyWhich two of the following government policies designed to limit the size of fish catches to sustainable levels have generally been effective in reaching that goal?Multiple select question.Issuing individual transferable quotas (ITQs)Limiting the number of fishing boats allowed to fish in a specific areaLimiting fish catch sizes to a total allowable catch (TAC)Limiting the number of days that a certain species of fish can be caught

Multiple Choice QuestionPeople who borrow money value it for Blank______.Multiple choice question.the interest they have to paywhat it can purchaseits own sakeits function as an economic resource

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.