Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

6.66pointseBookPrintReferencesCheck my workCheck My Work button is now enabledItem 11The horizontal axis ranges from 1960 to 2010 in increments of 10. The left vertical axis is labeled growth in percentage or children in numbers. It ranges from 0 to 7 in increments of 1. The right vertical axis is labeled G D P, U.S. dollars per capital. It ranges from 0 to 12,000 in increments of 2,000. The data for G D P per capita is as follows. 1960: 2,000. 1970: 5,000. 1980: 7,000. 1990: 7,000. 2000: 7,800. 2010: 10,000. The population growth is represented by a curve that begins at (1960, 3), passes through (1970, 2.8), (1980, 2.5), (1990, 1.8), and (2000, 1.5), and ends at (2010, 1). The number of children per woman is represented by a curve that begins at (1960, 6.2), passes through (1970, 5.9), (1980, 4.2), (1990, 2.8), and (2000, 2.5), and ends at (2010, 1.9). All values are estimated.As indicted in the graph, birthrates in a country tend to as its citizens become affluent. This results in an relationship between population growth and economic output as measured by GDP.

Question

6.66pointseBookPrintReferencesCheck my workCheck My Work button is now enabledItem 11The horizontal axis ranges from 1960 to 2010 in increments of 10. The left vertical axis is labeled growth in percentage or children in numbers. It ranges from 0 to 7 in increments of 1. The right vertical axis is labeled G D P, U.S. dollars per capital. It ranges from 0 to 12,000 in increments of 2,000. The data for G D P per capita is as follows. 1960: 2,000. 1970: 5,000. 1980: 7,000. 1990: 7,000. 2000: 7,800. 2010: 10,000. The population growth is represented by a curve that begins at (1960, 3), passes through (1970, 2.8), (1980, 2.5), (1990, 1.8), and (2000, 1.5), and ends at (2010, 1). The number of children per woman is represented by a curve that begins at (1960, 6.2), passes through (1970, 5.9), (1980, 4.2), (1990, 2.8), and (2000, 2.5), and ends at (2010, 1.9). All values are estimated.As indicted in the graph, birthrates in a country tend to as its citizens become affluent. This results in an relationship between population growth and economic output as measured by GDP.

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

Based on the data provided in the graph, it can be inferred that birthrates in a country tend to decrease as its citizens become more affluent. This results in an inverse relationship between population growth and economic output as measured by GDP.

Here's the step-by-step analysis:

  1. The GDP per capita, which is a measure of affluence, increases from 2000 U.S. dollars in 1960 to 10,000 U.S. dollars in 2010.

  2. During the same period, the number of children per woman, which is a measure of birthrate, decreases from 6.2 in 1960 to 1.9 in 2010.

  3. Similarly, the population growth also decreases from 3% in 1960 to 1% in 2010.

  4. Therefore, as GDP per capita increases (indicating increased affluence), both birthrate and population growth decrease.

  5. This indicates an inverse relationship between population growth (and birthrate) and economic output as measured by GDP.

In other words, as a country's citizens become wealthier, they tend to have fewer children, resulting in slower population growth. This is consistent with the demographic-economic paradox, which states that richer societies have a lower fertility rate.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

6.66pointseBookPrintReferencesCheck my workCheck My Work button is now disabledItem 14Which of the following best accounts for the large increase in population since the 1800?Multiple ChoiceDecrease in education costs.Steady increase in number of people capable of reproducing.Growth rates have increased.It is more culturally acceptable to have more children.

Use the figure to answer the question.  The income expenditure multiplier equalsGroup of answer choices0.5624

Question 7Refer to the 'Poverty Rates for the Developing World' graph in Chapter 1. For line indicating $2 per day, the poverty rate in 1980 went from approximately 70% to about ____ in 2010.1 point40%14%55%60%

Using the table below, graph the aggregate supply and demand curves and then answer three questions and graph an AD shift.  Real GDP (in $ Trillions)Price Level Supplied Demanded100 4 16110 10 15140 14 12200 15 6Instructions: Use the tools provided 'AS' and 'AD' to plot the aggregate supply and aggregate demand curves (plot 4 points total for each curve).

You've been provided with the following information about a businessComplete a VERTICAL analysis for the "Wages Payable" account for the current year. Round the percentage to one decimal place.Note: Do not enter the "%" symbol when entering your answer. For example if your answer is "5.1%", only enter "5.1". If your answer is negative - remember to include the minus.Balance sheet Current year Prior yearCurrent Assets Cash 14,250 16,700Accounts Receivable 14,000 3,500Inventory 6,000 2,500Prepaid Expenses 650 1,500Non-current assetsProperty Plant Equipment 192,500 193,500Land 210,000 210,000TOTAL ASSETS 437,400 427,700Current liabilitiesAccounts Payable 11,700 4,200Unearned Revenue 3,500 2,000Wages Payable 3,500 2,500Non-current liabilitiesBank Loan 118,000 122,500TOTAL LIABILITIES 136,700 131,200NET ASSETS 300,700 296,500Equity Share Capital 255,000 250,000Retained Earnings 45,700 46,500TOTAL EQUITY 300,700 296,500

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.