A worker is exposed to noise according to the following schedule: Exposure level (dB) 92 95 97 102 Period of exposure (Hrs) 3 2 2 1 Permissible duration OSHA standards (Hrs) 6-04 4.0 3-02 1-31 i. Does the daily noise dose exceed as per OSHA standards? ii. If yes, suggest alternate schedule of duration of his stay in different units so that the daily dose is not exceeded.
Question
A worker is exposed to noise according to the following schedule: Exposure level (dB) 92 95 97 102 Period of exposure (Hrs) 3 2 2 1 Permissible duration OSHA standards (Hrs) 6-04 4.0 3-02 1-31 i. Does the daily noise dose exceed as per OSHA standards? ii. If yes, suggest alternate schedule of duration of his stay in different units so that the daily dose is not exceeded.
Solution 1
i. To determine if the daily noise dose exceeds OSHA standards, we need to compare the worker's period of exposure to the permissible duration according to OSHA standards for each exposure level.
- For 92 dB, the worker is exposed for 3 hours while the permissible duration is 6.04 hours. So, the worker is within the permissible limit.
- For 95 dB, the worker is exposed for 2 hours while the permissible duration is 4 hours. So, the worker is within the permissible limit.
- For 97 dB, the worker is exposed for 2 hours while the permissible duration is 3.02 hours. So, the worker is within the permissible limit.
- For 102 dB, the worker is exposed for 1 hour while the permissible duration is 1.31 hours. So, the worker is within the permissible limit.
Therefore, the worker's daily noise dose does not exceed OSHA standards.
ii. Since the daily noise dose does not exceed OSHA standards, there is no need to suggest an alternate schedule. The current schedule is already within the permissible limits.
Solution 2
i. To determine if the daily noise dose exceeds OSHA standards, we need to compare the worker's actual period of exposure to the permissible duration according to OSHA standards for each exposure level.
- For 92 dB, the worker is exposed for 3 hours while the permissible duration is 6.04 hours. So, the worker is within the permissible limit.
- For 95 dB, the worker is exposed for 2 hours while the permissible duration is 4 hours. So, the worker is within the permissible limit.
- For 97 dB, the worker is exposed for 2 hours while the permissible duration is 3.02 hours. So, the worker is within the permissible limit.
- For 102 dB, the worker is exposed for 1 hour while the permissible duration is 1.31 hours. So, the worker is within the permissible limit.
Therefore, the worker's daily noise dose does not exceed OSHA standards.
ii. Since the daily noise dose does not exceed OSHA standards, there is no need to suggest an alternate schedule. However, if the worker's exposure times were to increase, it would be necessary to adjust the schedule to ensure the worker is not exposed to noise levels for longer than the permissible durations.
Similar Questions
Long-term exposure to noises at high sound level may cause temporary or even permanent [A]. Noise level is measured in [B] and the symbol of the unit is [C].
Refer to the following article to answer the next two questions. Noise Exposure and Public HealthExposure to noise constitutes a health risk. There is sufficient scientific evidence that noise exposure can induce hearing impairment, hypertension and heart disease, annoyance, sleep disturbance, and decreased school performance. For other effects such as changes in the immune system and birth defects, the evidence is limited. Most public health impacts of noise were already identified in the 1960s, and noise abatement is less of a scientific but primarily a policy problem. A subject for further research is the [clarification] of the mechanisms underlying noise-induced cardiovascular disorders and the relationship of noise with annoyance and non-acoustical factors modifying health outcomes. A high-priority study subject is the effect of noise on children, including cognitive effects and their reversibility. Noise exposure is on the increase, especially in the general living environment, both in industrialized nations and in developing world regions. This implies that in the twenty-first century noise exposure will still be a major public health problem. Which of the following best describes why the authors claim that reducing noise exposure is currently more of a public policy problem than a scientific problem?There is sufficient scientific evidence that noise exposure can induce hypertension and heart disease.⊝The relationship of noise with annoyance that negatively impacts human health is a subject for future research.⊝Most public health impacts of noise were already identified in the 1960s.⊝It is unclear whether negative cognitive effects are reversible in humans.⊝CLEAR ALL
Level of noise recommended in most countries is*1 point30-40 dB95-100 d B85-90 d B75-80d B
Which of the following is an example of an administrative control for noise exposure? Group of answer choicesSound absorption bafflesChanging work schedule to avoid noiseUse of ear plugsVibration dampening
The author cites examples of noise pollution in heavy industrial pockets to conclusively prove to thereader that ..........
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.