A monopolist engaging in third-degree price discriminationGroup of answer choiceshas lower profit than a monopolist engaging in first-degree price discriminationcreates a deadweight losscan identify with group of consumers any particular individual consumer belongs tocan prevent arbitrage between different groups (or types) of consumers but not within groups of consumers.All of the above
Question
A monopolist engaging in third-degree price discriminationGroup of answer choiceshas lower profit than a monopolist engaging in first-degree price discriminationcreates a deadweight losscan identify with group of consumers any particular individual consumer belongs tocan prevent arbitrage between different groups (or types) of consumers but not within groups of consumers.All of the above
Solution
The answer to your question depends on the specific context, but here's a general explanation of each choice:
-
A monopolist engaging in third-degree price discrimination has lower profit than a monopolist engaging in first-degree price discrimination: This could be true. First-degree price discrimination, also known as perfect price discrimination, allows the monopolist to capture all consumer surplus, potentially leading to higher profits. However, it requires perfect information about each consumer's willingness to pay, which is rarely available in reality.
-
Creates a deadweight loss: This is generally true for any form of monopoly, as monopolists typically produce less and charge more than would occur in a competitive market, leading to a loss of social welfare or deadweight loss.
-
Can identify with group of consumers any particular individual consumer belongs to: This is true. Third-degree price discrimination involves charging different prices to different groups of consumers, so the monopolist must be able to identify which group a particular consumer belongs to.
-
Can prevent arbitrage between different groups (or types) of consumers but not within groups of consumers: This is generally true. The monopolist can try to prevent arbitrage (i.e., consumers buying at a low price and reselling at a higher price) between groups by implementing measures such as student IDs for student discounts. However, it's much harder to prevent arbitrage within a group, as the monopolist is charging the same price to all consumers in that group.
-
All of the above: Given the explanations above, this could be the correct answer if all the individual statements are true in the specific context of the question.
Similar Questions
In second-degree price discrimination:Group of answer choicesthe monopolist knows the type (their willingness to pay WTP) of each and every consumerthe monopolist extracts all of the surplus from each type of consumerthe monopolist knows the WTP for each type of consumer, but cannot identify which type of consumer any individual is (before the purchase the product)the monopolist uses the bundles of price/quantity or price/quality to induce consumers to reveal their type (WTP) by their purchase decision.c and d. PreviousNext
If consumers are identical, thenGroup of answer choicesprice discrimination is impossible.price discrimination can occur if each consumer has a downward-sloping demand curve for the product.perfect price discrimination is the only form of price discrimination that can increase a monopoly's profit.bundling can increase a monopoly's profit.
A third-degree price-discriminating pure monopoly will follow a system whereMultiple Choicebuyers with relatively more inelastic demands are charged higher prices than buyers with relatively more elastic demands.all buyers are charged the same price regardless of their elasticity of demand.the price of the product is held the same even if the demand changes.buyers with relatively more inelastic demands are charged lower prices than buyers with relatively more elastic demands.
This exercise is about pricing strategies and price discrimination. Choose all the correct answers.Question 1Answera.Selling bread for $4, butter for $4 and bread and butter combined for $7 is an example of second degree price discrimination.b.A monopolist applying third degree price discrimination can improve consumer welfare compared to the scenario in which they set one market-level price.c.First degree price discrimination is efficient, but rarely possible in real world.d.A monopolist knows valuations of consumers, and sets prices individually for each of the consumer at the level of their valuation. This is an example of first-order price discrimination.
Explain one way in which consumers could benefit from price discrimination.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.