Difference between Procedural programming and OOPs?

Procedural Programming and Object-Oriented Programming (OOPs) are two different programming paradigms. Here are the key differences between them:

1. Approach: Procedural programming is based on procedures or routines, i.e., sequence of instructions, while OOPs is based on the concept of "objects", which contains data and methods to manipulate the data.

2. Data Security: In procedural programming, data can easily be accessed and modified from outside the function or program. In contrast, OOPs provides data hiding, thus better security for the data.

3. Code Structure: Procedural programming follows a top-down programming structure, it starts with a high level of functionality and details are defined as the program is written. On the other hand, OOPs follows a bottom-up approach, where individual objects are defined and grouped together to form a larger system.

4. Modularity: In procedural programming, the program is divided into small parts called functions. In OOPs, the program is divided into parts called objects.

5. Code Reusability: Procedural programming doesn't offer a lot of scope for reusability of code. However, in OOPs, the concept of inheritance allows the properties of one class to be inherited by another, promoting reusability.

6. Flexibility: OOPs is more flexible due to the division of tasks into objects. Changes in one part of the program do not affect other parts, which is not the case with procedural programming.

7. Complexity: Procedural programming is best suited for simple, straightforward programming tasks, while OOPs is better suited for more complex software systems.

8. Examples: Languages like C, Fortran, and COBOL use procedural programming, while languages like Java, C++, and Python use OOPs.