"Are you aware of administrative and regulatory tools in Ghana (like efficiency standards for cars, for home heating systems, for light bulbs, for other appliances such as fridges, air conditioners etc.?) Do you find these measures fair? Do you think people would be ready to pay a carbon tax but be free to use whatever equipment they want? Would they accept a carbon tax if the money were returned as an equal sum to each citizen? Do you think a cap & trade system would be better than a carbon tax? In Ghana, what actions are being discussed or implemented? Regarding the issue of sharing burden, do you think that countries with a high income per person should bear more of the burden? Should countries with high emissions per person receive help from countries with low emissions? How about between citizens: should the rich bear more of the burden of decarbonization? Should sectors in the economy of your country that stand to lose be supported?"

As an AI, I don't have personal opinions or awareness. However, I can provide information based on available data.

1. Ghana has been making strides in implementing administrative and regulatory tools for energy efficiency. For instance, the Ghana Standards Authority has set standards for energy efficiency and labelling for refrigerating appliances.

2. The fairness of these measures is subjective and would depend on individual perspectives. Some may view them as necessary for environmental conservation, while others may see them as restrictive.

3. The acceptance of a carbon tax would also vary among individuals. Some may be willing to pay if they can use any equipment they want, while others may oppose it. The idea of returning the tax as an equal sum to each citizen could potentially increase acceptance.

4. Whether a cap & trade system is better than a carbon tax would depend on various factors, including the specific economic and environmental context of Ghana.

5. In Ghana, various actions are being discussed or implemented, such as the promotion of renewable energy, reforestation initiatives, and the development of a climate change policy framework.

6. The issue of burden sharing is complex. Some argue that high-income countries, which have historically contributed more to carbon emissions, should bear more of the burden. Others suggest that high-emission countries should receive help from low-emission countries to transition to greener technologies.

7. Similarly, the distribution of decarbonization costs among citizens is a matter of debate. Some argue that the rich, who often have larger carbon footprints, should bear more of the burden.

8. Whether sectors that stand to lose from decarbonization should be supported is also subjective. Some may argue that support is necessary to ensure a just transition, while others may believe that market forces should determine the outcome.

Remember, these are complex issues with diverse viewpoints. The information provided here is a general overview and may not capture all nuances of these debates.