When the Ebola virus came to the United States in 2014 and people were quarantined against their will, which model addresses this?Group of answer choicesUtilitarianismPaternalismAutonomyStewardship

The model that addresses the situation when the Ebola virus came to the United States in 2014 and people were quarantined against their will is Paternalism.

Here's why:

1. Utilitarianism: This model is based on the principle of the greatest good for the greatest number. While it could be argued that quarantine serves the greater good by preventing the spread of the virus, it doesn't specifically address the issue of quarantine against one's will.

2. Paternalism: This model is based on the principle of making decisions for others for their own good, even if it is against their will. This is the model that most directly addresses the situation of forced quarantine. The government, acting in a paternalistic role, decided that quarantine was necessary to protect public health.

3. Autonomy: This model is based on the principle of individual freedom and self-determination. It is the opposite of what happened in the situation described, where people were quarantined against their will.

4. Stewardship: This model is based on the principle of taking care of others and the community. While it could be argued that quarantine is a form of stewardship, it doesn't specifically address the issue of quarantine against one's will.