He says neither capitalism with its connection with liberalism norstate socialism with its formal commitment to social justice, can avoid the use of bureaucratic means of administrative domination. Theimpersonality and calculability characters of the bureaucracy are seen not only as constraining

The statement seems to be discussing the inherent bureaucratic nature of both capitalism and state socialism. The author argues that both economic systems, despite their differing ideologies and goals, inevitably resort to bureaucratic methods to exert administrative control.

The impersonality and calculability of bureaucracy are seen as limiting factors in both systems. Impersonality refers to the objective and unbiased nature of bureaucracy, where decisions and actions are supposed to be made based on rational factors rather than personal feelings or biases. Calculability refers to the ability to predict outcomes based on certain inputs or actions, which is a key feature of bureaucratic systems.

In capitalism, bureaucracy is often associated with corporate structures and government regulations. Despite capitalism's connection with liberalism, which values individual freedom and limited government intervention, the use of bureaucratic means is unavoidable in managing complex economic activities and maintaining order.

In state socialism, bureaucracy is used to administer social justice and manage state-owned enterprises. Despite its formal commitment to social justice, state socialism cannot avoid using bureaucratic means to achieve its goals.

In conclusion, the author argues that bureaucracy is an inherent and unavoidable aspect of both capitalism and state socialism, despite their differing ideologies and objectives.