A farmer is considering using pesticides to increase crop yields on their farm. The use of pesticides would result in higher crop production but could also lead to water pollution and harm to non-target species. What is the potential cost-benefit trade-offs of using pesticides on the farm?Select TWO correct answers.A.Higher crop yieldsB.Reduced water pollutionC.Harm to non-target speciesD.Increased soil fertility
Question
A farmer is considering using pesticides to increase crop yields on their farm. The use of pesticides would result in higher crop production but could also lead to water pollution and harm to non-target species. What is the potential cost-benefit trade-offs of using pesticides on the farm?Select TWO correct answers.A.Higher crop yieldsB.Reduced water pollutionC.Harm to non-target speciesD.Increased soil fertility
Solution
The correct answers are:
A. Higher crop yields C. Harm to non-target species
Explanation:
The use of pesticides can indeed lead to higher crop yields, which is a potential benefit (A). However, a potential cost or trade-off is the harm that can be done to non-target species, such as beneficial insects, birds, and other wildlife that can be negatively affected by the pesticides (C).
The options B (Reduced water pollution) and D (Increased soil fertility) are not correct because the use of pesticides often leads to water pollution, not reduction, and it doesn't necessarily increase soil fertility.
Similar Questions
To increase yields, farmers use toxic pesticides to kill pests that ruin crops. However, some of these toxic chemicals the food we eat, and also end up in our . The use of pesticides over time has caused pests to evolve and become resistant to the chemicals, causing farmers to apply quantities on their crops, which the environmental side-effects.
A group of farmers is considering using pesticides to increase crop yields. Some members of the group believe that using pesticides is necessary to ensure food security, while others argue that pesticides harm the environment and human health. How do ethical beliefs influence the use of pesticides in this scenario? A.Ethical beliefs have no impact on the use of pesticides.B.Ethical beliefs may lead to the rejection of pesticides to prioritize environmental and human health.C.Ethical beliefs can influence the acceptance of pesticides to ensure food security.D.Ethical beliefs may result in the use of pesticides without consideration for environmental or health impacts.
Which of the following is a beneficial effect of genetic engineering on the environment and organisms? Group of answer choicesIncrease in the price of products due to high costs of genetic engineering methods.Pesticide resistant crops can transfer their genes to weeds creating pesticide resistant weeds.Some organisms may have allergic reactions to drugs and food produced through genetic engineering.Production of bigger and more productive livestock.
Select all that applySome of the criticisms leveled at organic agriculture include that Blank______.Multiple select question.it is too labor intensiveit is too inefficient to feed large populationsit requires extensive application of synthetic pesticidesoverall cost of organic agriculture far surpasses that of conventional techniquesNeed help? Review these concept resources.
What is a primary benefit of organic farming compared to conventional farming?(1 Point)A. Higher use of chemical inputsB. Increased biodiversity and environmental healthC. Guaranteed higher crop yieldsD. Lower market prices for consumers
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.