The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4) given in this question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper order for the sentences and key in this sequence of four numbers as your answer. 1. It was his taxpayers who had to shell out as much as $1.6bn over 10 years to employees of failed companies. 2. Companies in many countries routinely engage in such activities which means that the employees are left with unpaid entitlements 3. Deliberate and systematic liquidation of a company to avoid liabilities and then restarting the business is called phoenixing. 4. The Australian Minister for Revenue and Services discovered in an audit that phoenixing had cost the Australian economy between 2.9bnand2.9bnand5.1bn last year. 2431 3241 1234 1423
Question
The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, and 4) given in this question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper order for the sentences and key in this sequence of four numbers as your answer.
- It was his taxpayers who had to shell out as much as $1.6bn over 10 years to employees of failed companies.
- Companies in many countries routinely engage in such activities which means that the employees are left with unpaid entitlements
- Deliberate and systematic liquidation of a company to avoid liabilities and then restarting the business is called phoenixing.
- The Australian Minister for Revenue and Services discovered in an audit that phoenixing had cost the Australian economy between 2.9bnand2.9bnand5.1bn last year.
2431 3241 1234 1423
Solution
The correct sequence for the sentences to form a coherent paragraph is 3241.
- Deliberate and systematic liquidation of a company to avoid liabilities and then restarting the business is called phoenixing.
- Companies in many countries routinely engage in such activities which means that the employees are left with unpaid entitlements
- The Australian Minister for Revenue and Services discovered in an audit that phoenixing had cost the Australian economy between 2.9bnand2.9bnand5.1bn last year.
- It was his taxpayers who had to shell out as much as $1.6bn over 10 years to employees of failed companies.
Similar Questions
Q 24. The sentences given below form a coherent passage when arranged logically. Choose the option which gives the correct sequence. 1. Things were at an all time low when the new CEO was onboarded. 2. One would expect cuts to be made in employee benefits and expenses that are often regarded as superfluous. 3. At the outset, she began making some pretty radical changes. 4. But she instead increased salaries by 8%, added 2 sick leaves for everyone, and restarted Casual Fridays. 5. "The employees' trust needed to be won back", she said in an interview later. And win back trust she did. Ops: A. 1 3 2 4 5 B. 5 4 3 1 2 C. 5 4 1 2 3 D. 3 2 1 4 5
If a firm fails to meet its responsibilities to _____, it may be forced into bankruptcy. A. its employees B. the environment C. the government D. its creditors E. its owners
The four sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3 and 4) given below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the four numbers as your answer.1. It's business as usual for the military; total global military expenditure reached US$2443 billion in 2023, an increase of 6.8% in real terms from 2022, says the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) — the steepest year-on-year increase since 2009.2. We, like most of Asia south of the Himalaya, are now living on the heating planet which experts have long warned of and science has projected for decades.3. Meanwhile, as if nothing untoward was happening, wars in Ukraine and Gaza are — besides death, destruction and misery — producing staggering amounts of greenhouse gases.4. On a slow, sweltering summer afternoon at the edge of a forest in deep rural northern Thailand, the brain fever bird is doing my head in with its insistent, rising call.
Select all that applyWhat are the elements of the promissory estoppel exception to the statute of frauds? (Check all that apply.)Multiple select question.Both parties can no longer profit from the contract.The detrimental reliance of the injured party could have been foreseen by the other party.One party to the contract must be a minor.One party detrimentally relied on an oral promise.
In the question below, there is a sentence with jumbled-up parts. Rearrange these parts, which are labeled A, B, C, and D to produce the correct sentence. Choose the proper sequence.a. The CEOb. of making the right decisionc. was not scaredd. despite a loss in profits
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.