This study aimed to examine how Perceived support, self-efficacy, hope, and well-being are associated with each other. Which of the following statements is correct in light of the correlation table below?*p<.05; **p<.01Question 4Answera.Self-efficacy has a moderate relationship with well-beingb.Perceived support and self-efficacy show a strong associationc.When hope increases, well-being levels decreased.Perceived support and well-being show a strong positive relationshipe.All statements are applicable

Which of the following would likely decrease an individual’s self-efficacy with regard to a particular task? A.Seeing a task performed successfullyB.Feeling that past failures were due to other circumstancesC.Being offered positive encouragement by othersD.Learning stress-reduction techniques in regard to the task

Self-efficacy, according to Albert Bandura, refers to:A) The belief in one's capabilities to execute actions required for desired outcomesB) The tendency to engage in behaviors based on expected rewardsC) The internal conflicts that shape personalityD) The influence of neurotransmitters on behavior

ResultsIt was expected that flow, mindfulness, andhope would be positively correlated tohappiness, social relationships, and GPA. Inother words, students who reported greaterexperience of flow, mindfulness, and hope wouldbe happier, have a better quality of socialrelationships, and have a higher GPA.Through correlational analyses, it was foundthat flow, mindfulness, and hope weresignificantly and positively correlated withhappiness (Table 1). When flow, mindfulness,and hope were input into a multiple regressionequation, they accounted for 39% of the totalvariance in happiness, F (3, 118) = 25.23, p < .01;however, only hope remained a significantpredictor. It was found that controlling for hopereduced the relationship between mindfulnessand happiness from R (126) = .30, p < .01, to R(118) = .11, p = .16. A Sobel test revealed that therelationship between mindfulness and happinesswas fully mediated by hope, z = 3.23, p < .01.Similarly, it was found that controlling for hopereduced the relationship between flow andhappiness from R (124) = .35, p < .01, to R (120)= .07, p = .37. Again, a Sobel test revealed thatthe relationship between flow and happiness wasfully mediated by hope, z = 4.74, p < .01.Through further correlational analyses, itwas found that flow and hope were significantlyand positively correlated with socialrelationships, although mindfulness was not(Table 2). When flow and hope were entered intoa multiple regression equation, they accountedfor 22% of the total variance in socialrelationships, F (2, 120) = 17.03, p < .01;however, only hope remained a significantpredictor. It was found that controlling for hopereduced the relationship between flow and socialrelationships from R (124) = .30, p < .01, to R(120) = .13, p = .15. As before, a Sobel testrevealed that the relationship between flow andsocial relationships was fully mediated by hope,z = 4.06, p < .01.Lastly, correlational analyses revealed thatneither flow, mindfulness, nor hope weresignificantly correlated with GPA (Table 3)

What factor contributes most to one’s sense of self-efficacy? a. expected rewards or punishments b. others doubting one’s ability c. past personal performance accomplishments d. expressions of confidence from others

People with Self efficacy think feel and behave in a way to successa.None of the aboveb.Randomly leadc.Contributesd.Deviates