Unique: Next, comment on interesting and unique aspects of the submission - what did you find interesting about it?Revision: Third, be a “critical friend” - what suggestions do you have for improvement or revision. The purpose is not so much “to grade” as to interact and suggest.Education: Close by reflecting on what you learned and how you were educated from the submission as a feedback provider.Directions for rating the Failure Resume Assignment:0 = the submissions only lists two or fewer failures and there is no elaboration about them1 = 3 or 4 failures listed and discussed at some detail and connected with 3 or 4 success2 = 5 or more failures and success are listed in the submission and discussed insightfully

Write a short reflection on how feedback has informed your final Critical Commentary submission. Feedback includes: general class feedback; individual feedback on Assignment 2.1 Initial Analysis; any other feedback in tutorials and lectures, from your tutor and/or the unit-coordinator, whether received individually or as part of small or larger groups. Tutor feedback: You identify and discuss some of the key techniques in the sequence chosen, such as tracking shots and mise-en-scène. However, aim to be more precise in the use of terminology. You do a good job of describing the effects of the different techniques noted. I would have liked to see a bit more analysis of the techniques and their affect. Overall, good written expression, but there is occasionally some awkward word choices. Proofreading by reading the work out loud will help with that. Remember also that titles of texts ought to be italicised.

3. Discuss the value of academic feedback from a student perspective.

W14 Reflection: FinalStart AssignmentDue Thursday by 9:59am Points 50 Submitting a file upload File Types doc and docxOverviewTask: Write an essay.Purpose: Reflect and report on your learning and change throughout the semester. Instructor: Your instructor will grade your essay based on the rubric.InstructionsReflect on the class and your change throughout the semester.Open a new Word document and write an essay to respond to the questions below.Your personal experience:Discuss your learning progress.Were there any difficulties or successes?Were your ideas challenged?What topics were your most or least favorites?Your experience with the application assignments and your social innovation:Reflect on your category and social innovation. Can you solve this social problem?What did you learn about each topic? Explain.Your future:How will you apply social innovation in your life, career, family, or education?Ensure your essay meets the following criteria:Be specific; avoid fluff.Take your time. Although this is a personal reflection, it is also considered your final exam and will be graded on content and quality of writing.Your essay should be between 4–6 pages in length and double-spaced.Review the grading rubric below as well as the information provided on the Reflection Journal page. Make edits to your essay as needed.Save your essay.Submit your reflection essay to this assignment.RubricW14 Final Reflection RubricW14 Final Reflection RubricCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDifficulties and Successes10 ptsProfessionalThoughtfully discusses the difficulties and successes of your learning process throughout the semester. Includes a reflection about how your ideas changed over the course of the semester.9 ptsCollegiateDiscusses the difficulties and successes of your learning process throughout the semester. Includes information how your ideas changed over the course of the semester.8 ptsAcceptableSome discussion of the learning process throughout the semester but discussion lacks some detail.6 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe journal entry fails to address some components or nuances of the assignment.0 ptsUnacceptableThe information provided is inadequate.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSocial Innovation Issue10 ptsProfessionalThoughtfully describes the social innovation issue worked on this semester. Explains in detail the challenges and opportunities you uncovered in your research.9 ptsCollegiateDescribes the social innovation issue worked on this semester. Explains the challenges and opportunities you uncovered in your research.8 ptsAcceptableAdequately describes the social innovation issue worked on this semester. Notes some challenges found in your research.6 ptsNeeds ImprovementSome important details about the social innovation issue and challenges are left out.0 ptsUnacceptableThe information provided is inadequate.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFuture10 ptsProfessionalThoughtfully explains how you will apply social innovation in your life going forward. Includes information for career, family, or education.9 ptsCollegiateExplains how you will apply social innovation in your life going forward.8 ptsAcceptableAdequately explains how you will apply social innovation in the future.6 ptsNeeds ImprovementImportant details about applying social innovation are not present.0 ptsUnacceptableThe information provided is inadequate.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDepth of Learning10 ptsProfessionalShows outstanding depth of learning and engagement in chosen social innovation issue.9 ptsCollegiateShows some depth of learning and engagement in chosen social innovation issue.8 ptsAcceptableAdequate learning and engagement is seen in chosen social innovation issue.6 ptsNeeds ImprovementSome learning and engagement is seen regarding the social innovation issue.0 ptsUnacceptableThe information provided is inadequate.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, spelling, punctuation2 ptsProfessionalThe journal entry is free from grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. The format is professional and appealing.1.7 ptsCollegiate1.5 ptsAcceptable1.3 ptsNeeds Improvement0 ptsUnacceptableThe journal entry is difficult to understand due to errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Formatting is poor.2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFlow and Transitions2 ptsProfessionalThe journal entry flows and transitions well.1.7 ptsCollegiate1.5 ptsAcceptable1.3 ptsNeeds Improvement0 ptsUnacceptableThe journal entry is difficult to understand due to poor flow. Transitions are non-existent.2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTone2 ptsProfessionalThe journal entry uses an appropriate tone.1.7 ptsCollegiate1.5 ptsAcceptable1.3 ptsNeeds Improvement0 ptsUnacceptableThe journal entry exhibits major problems regarding tone.2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVocabulary and Writing Skills2 ptsProfessionalThe journal entry is written using a college level vocabulary and exhibits excellent writing skills.1.7 ptsCollegiate1.5 ptsAcceptable1.3 ptsNeeds Improvement0 ptsUnacceptableThe journal entry exhibits major problems regarding word choice and writing skills.2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength2 ptsProfessionalThe journal entry is at least 4 pages. Maximum length is 6 pages.0 ptsUnacceptableThe journal entry does not meet the length requirement.2 ptsTotal Points: 50PreviousNext

Peer assessment improves learning for:Question 29Select one:a.The student receiving the feedbackb.The student writing the feedbackc.Both A & Bd.None of the above

Think of some tough feedback you’ve received and the way you responded. What are some insights you gained in this lesson you could use as you receive tough feedback in the future?