In considering NBAC’s analytic approach, an otherwise competent person who is acutely ill might be considered at especially high risk of harm for: Capacity-related cognitive vulnerability Situational cognitive vulnerability Economic vulnerability Communicative vulnerability

Subjects with a serious illness may be at risk for exploitation because they may be desperate for a possible cure. This is an example of: Therapeutic misconception Deferential vulnerability Economic vulnerability Medical vulnerability

those positive resources and abilities which are helpful to individuals, families and community in mitigating, preparing for, responding to and recovering from the hazard impact(1 Point)CapacitiesDisasterDisaster damageDisaster impactEmergencyHazardRiskVulnerability

Question 1The NBAC looks at characteristics individuals might have that would prevent them from being able to provide voluntary informed consent. The traits may be thought of as falling into six broad areas: cognitive or communicative, institutional, deferential, medical, economic, and social. Prospective research subjects who are not able to comprehend information, deliberate, and make decisions about participation in a proposed research study have a: Economic or social vulnerability Institutional vulnerability Physical vulnerability Cognitive or communicative vulnerabilityQuestion 2When an IRB is reviewing a research study and they are considering if a potential subject population is vulnerable, they should consider: Are there adequate resources to conduct the study? Is there a power differential between researchers and subjects? Are the research procedures greater than minimal risk of harm? Has the researcher completed required training?Question 3A subject participates in a drug study because treatment is available at no or reduced cost, and he could not otherwise afford it. This is an example of: Communicative vulnerability Economic vulnerability Social vulnerability Institutional vulnerabilityQuestion 4Which is true of inducements in research? Inducements constitute an “undue influence” if they alter a potential subject’s decision-making processes, such that they do not appropriately weigh the risk-benefit relationship of the research. Inducements, like coercion, are always inappropriate, as they violate the ethical principle of respect for persons. Offering $10 for an hour long research study constitutes undue inducement. Like coercion, undue inducement is easy for IRBs to determine.Question 5In considering NBAC’s analytic approach, an otherwise competent person who is acutely ill might be considered at especially high risk of harm for: Capacity-related cognitive vulnerability Communicative vulnerability Situational cognitive vulnerability Economic vulnerability

As one of the risk factors in medication-related problems, what is the definition and the risk involved for older adults in cognitive impairment?

can also relate to hazardous events that do not result in the serious disruption of the functioning of a community or society(1 Point)CapacitiesDisasterDisaster damageDisaster impactEmergencyHazardRiskVulnerability