In this assignment, you will be designing a rigorous experimental piece of research that can evaluatethe impact of a single piece of information, your variable, that differs between two groups ofparticipants.Your study will have two groups of participants with Parkinson’s Disease and both groups will becompleting a cognitive training intervention. However, the difference between the groups (yourindependent variable, IV) will be the proportion (i.e., number and length) of computer-based trainingsessions you allocate to each group. You will decide this proportion and this decision must be justifiedby at least one original research article you review in Question 1 (see below).

14. The focus of motor behavior research today includes  Group of answer choicescognition and memoryshattering the myth that motor control diminishes with ageelite performancepotential treatments of disease and injury, including Parkinson's disease

A study where the researcher controls the variables by assigning subjects to groups is considered Hint, displayed below

A group of students wanted to investigate the effect of different concentrations of a sports drink on Daphnia.  Design an investigation to test the research statement. Your answer should include the following:Independent variabledependent variablethree control variablesprocedure and manipulation of variablesmethod of recording of dataethical considerations

Assist me in paraphrasing my paragraph below as i copy and paste most sentences from article and also tidy and reduce any unnecessary words or sentences that may confuse the reader keeping the gist of the essay and ensure coherent and logical flow: Cognitive-oriented intervention is currently the NPT that has been better explored in dementia and complements pharmacological treatment. Cognitive-oriented interventions are composed of three main types: cognitive training(CT), cognitive stimulation(CS), and individualized cognitive rehabilitation(ICR) (Clare & Woods, 2004). These interventions have received increasing attention in recent years as preventive or enhancing treatment for AD (Bahar-Fuchs et al., 2013). CS typically refers to a wide range of group activities and discussions, including reminiscence therapy and reality orientation therapy, aiming to improve the individual's general cognitive and social functioning (D'Onofrio et al., 2017). Several studies reported an improvement in general cognitive functioning in patients with mild-to-moderate dementia after CS sessions of variable length (Woods et al., 2012). CT focuses on a particular cognitive function (e.g., attention, memory, executive functions, language) through standard tasks to improve or maintain (Hill et al., 2017). Research studies reported that the adaptive chunking training provided to patients with mild AD has led to significant improvements in verbal working memory performance, which was evidenced by reduced task-related activation of the lateral prefrontal and parietal cortex on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), indicating that chunking-based cognitive training may help maintain cognitive functions in the early stage of AD (Huntley et al., 2011). While CS and CT consist of a global approach to arouse all cognitive domains, past studies have only focused on mild to moderate AD, and it is unclear whether these interventions would be effective in severe AD. ICR addresses specific functional difficulties and sets realistic goals to help patients and their families daily. The rehabilitation program focuses mainly on developing compensatory strategies for impairment and improving the individual's performance in everyday situations to some extent rather than on cognitive performance itself (Kim, 2015). In a preliminary open trial, the ICR intervention was shown to reduce patients' depression and caregivers' distress simultaneously, and such a reduction was maintained at the 3-month follow-up after the intervention (García-Alberca, 2017). Additionally, studies documented that the association of CS and CT did not result in better outcomes than ICR interventions (Carrion et al., 2018). Despite promising evidence, the quality of the studies varies due to differences in sample size and methodological heterogeneity in different studies. Moreover, the long-term effects of cognitive interventions remain uncertain, as most studies have only followed participants for a short per

Five sentences related to a topic are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a meaningful and coherent short paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Choose its number as your answer and key it in.As the disease progresses, symptoms may begin to interfere with daily activities.Nor do they understand the strengths and weaknesses of existing treatments for Parkinson’s – nor even the unmet needs of people who have the disease.Smartphones, and other mobile devices worn or carried almost continuously by many, offer a way to do so.Those researchers might understand better, though, if they were able to track the day-to-day symptoms of large numbers of people who suffer from Parkinson's.Researchers do not really understand why people living with Parkinson’s disease have good days and bad ones.