Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

This study is part of The Equity Lens in Public Health (ELPH) program of research that commenced in 2011 to study the application of a health equity lens in BC health authorities [23]. As part of the broader program of research, we conducted a qualitative analysis ‘Assessing Health Equity Priorities’, which included a baseline examination of senior leaders’ perspectives on prioritization of health equity in the BC health system in 2013/2014. Our collaborative research team included public health systems leaders from Fraser Health Authority, Interior Health Authority, Island Health Authority, Northern Health Authority, and Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, the Provincial Health Services Authority, and the Ministry of Health. Ethical approval for this study (H11–03359) was provided by the University of Victoria, the University of British Columbia, the University of Saskatchewan, Fraser Health Authority, Interior Health Authority, Island Health Authority, Northern Health Authority, and Vancouver Coastal Health Authority research ethics review boards.We used a participatory process in which health authority partners and academic researchers worked collaboratively throughout the entire research process from developing the research questions, through planning the research design, to analyzing and interpreting the findings [25, 26]. Such participatory approaches are reflexive, dialectic process to better align research and theory with practice, and include stakeholders in knowledge generation that is relevant and useful; participatory approaches are aligned with integrated knowledge translation and exchange processes. We developed working groups and held meetings with partners for feedback for each stage of the research process including the development of the research questions, planning the research design, developing the interview guides, and analyzing and interpreting the data. This contributed to relevance and rigour of the research.

Question

This study is part of The Equity Lens in Public Health (ELPH) program of research that commenced in 2011 to study the application of a health equity lens in BC health authorities [23]. As part of the broader program of research, we conducted a qualitative analysis ‘Assessing Health Equity Priorities’, which included a baseline examination of senior leaders’ perspectives on prioritization of health equity in the BC health system in 2013/2014. Our collaborative research team included public health systems leaders from Fraser Health Authority, Interior Health Authority, Island Health Authority, Northern Health Authority, and Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, the Provincial Health Services Authority, and the Ministry of Health. Ethical approval for this study (H11–03359) was provided by the University of Victoria, the University of British Columbia, the University of Saskatchewan, Fraser Health Authority, Interior Health Authority, Island Health Authority, Northern Health Authority, and Vancouver Coastal Health Authority research ethics review boards.We used a participatory process in which health authority partners and academic researchers worked collaboratively throughout the entire research process from developing the research questions, through planning the research design, to analyzing and interpreting the findings [25, 26]. Such participatory approaches are reflexive, dialectic process to better align research and theory with practice, and include stakeholders in knowledge generation that is relevant and useful; participatory approaches are aligned with integrated knowledge translation and exchange processes. We developed working groups and held meetings with partners for feedback for each stage of the research process including the development of the research questions, planning the research design, developing the interview guides, and analyzing and interpreting the data. This contributed to relevance and rigour of the research.

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

Este estudio es parte del programa de investigación The Equity Lens in Public Health (ELPH) que comenzó en 2011 para estudiar la aplicación de una perspectiva de equidad en salud en las autoridades sanitarias de BC [23]. Como parte del programa de investigación más amplio, realizamos un análisis cualitativo 'Evaluando las Prioridades de Equidad en Salud', que incluyó un examen inicial de las perspectivas de los líderes senior sobre la priorización de la equidad en salud en el sistema de salud de BC en 2013/2014. Nuestro equipo de investigación colaborativo incluyó líderes de sistemas de salud pública de Fraser Health Authority, Interior Health Authority, Island Health Authority, Northern Health Authority y Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, la Provincial Health Services Authority y el Ministerio de Salud. La aprobación ética para este estudio (H11-03359) fue proporcionada por la Universidad de Victoria, la Universidad de Columbia Británica, la Universidad de Saskatchewan, Fraser Health Authority, Interior Health Authority, Island Health Authority, Northern Health Authority y Vancouver Coastal Health Authority juntas de revisión de ética en investigación. Utilizamos un proceso participativo en el que los socios de la autoridad sanitaria y los investigadores académicos trabajaron en colaboración durante todo el proceso de investigación, desde el desarrollo de las preguntas de investigación, la planificación del diseño de la investigación, hasta el análisis e interpretación de los hallazgos [25, 26]. Estos enfoques participativos son procesos reflexivos y dialécticos para alinear mejor la investigación y la teoría con la práctica, e incluyen a los interesados en la generación de conocimiento que es relevante y útil; los enfoques participativos están alineados con los procesos de traducción y intercambio de conocimientos integrados. Desarrollamos grupos de trabajo y celebramos reuniones con socios para obtener retroalimentación en cada etapa del proceso de investigación, incluyendo el desarrollo de las preguntas de investigación, la planificación del diseño de la investigación, el desarrollo de las guías de entrevista, y el análisis e interpretación de los datos. Esto contribuyó a la relevancia y rigor de la investigación.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

The ELPH program of research employs complexity theory, intersectionality, and critical social justice theories as theoretical foundations for research [23, 24]. In this study, we used complexity theory to guide our analytical process about what is needed for effective prioritization within complex health systems. We drew on Walby’s framework for theorizing about the intersections of social relations and institutional structures and the implications of this for supporting system responses to increase prioritization of health equity at multiple levels of the health system [27–29]. Within this understanding of complexity, we considered the implementation of a health equity lens to be an event inserted into the health system, and examined the resulting responses within various programs and levels of the system [10, 12, 30]. We conceptualized health systems as complex adaptive systems, in which system responses to enactment of a policy will depend on the multiple interactions and relationships that occur in that system as a result of that policy [10, 11, 30–32]. Thus, while change within a system will be influenced by formal organizational documents and policies, the system response that emerges will also reflect the informal organization that emerges through created structures, groups and processes [10, 12]. Anderson highlights the importance of understanding both these formal and informal aspects of a system, and the interactions between them, to gain insight into the way a system is functioning as a whole as well as to understand the specific system properties that influence change [10]. We aimed to understand how these formal and informal aspects, and their interactions, vary within different parts of the system, and the potential impact of this on the system response. This included identifying critical elements that facilitate prioritization of health equity within the health system, and the relationships among these elements.

Though the concept of one health is not new, its integration and implementation in health programs has been slow. How do you think we could quicken the acceptance of the concept to the many stakeholders involved in health, to ensure we achieve equity in human, animal, and environmental health?

How do you plan to collaborate with communities and stakeholders in your role as a Health Protection Officer?

What is the primary goal of the "One Health" initiative?

An emphasis on poverty and social justice in public health policies is best reflected in which of the following public health periods?Question 8Answera.Indigenous Controlb.Nation Buildingc.Affluence, medicine and infrastructured.New Public Health

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.