Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Using 100 words and a quote from "My Friend Flicka," argue whether or not children should be given what they want before doing what their parents want.

Question

Using 100 words and a quote from "My Friend Flicka," argue whether or not children should be given what they want before doing what their parents want.

🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

In "My Friend Flicka," O'Hara emphasizes the importance of responsibility and discipline. "You have to learn to stick to a thing, to master it, whether it pleases you or not." This quote suggests that children should not always be given what they want before fulfilling their parents' wishes. It's crucial for children to understand the value of responsibility and the importance of fulfilling obligations. This doesn't mean suppressing their desires, but rather teaching them the balance between duty and desire. Therefore, children should not always be given what they want before doing what their parents want.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

Write about the following topic: Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

wite essay about 250-300 words on the following topic: "Are parents always right"? describe any one such incident to prove your point.

Individual appropriateness should never involve lowering expectations for a child. a. True b. False

mention something offered by every generation with respect to children and their education

Direction: Read the passage given below and answer the following questions.Some parents urge their children to be the best in everything they do. They push them to be the best athlete, and the best scholar, and the best musician, and so on. Other parents urge their children to pursue whatever they are best at, whether it be athletics, academics or music. Some parents push their children to try their best. Still, others try hard not to push their children to be the best or even to try to be their best, because they worry about the psychological damage that such messages might cause. But, most parents love their children, and however they raise them, they are trying the best they can on their behalf. After all, most parents genuinely want what is best for their children – they have different conceptions of what that requires.In seeking what is best for their children, most parents are implicitly buying into what has been the dominant view of individual rationality, at least in the West, since the time of the Greeks. On this conception, what it is to be rational is to act so as to maximize the overall quality of one’s life over the course of one’s life – that is, a rational agent chooses whatever options will make her life, as a whole, go as well as possible. The United States Army’s advertising slogan ‘Be All You Can Be’ taps into this picture of what it is for an individual agent to be rational.Built into the standard conception of rationality are two fundamental assumptions. The first is that there is a best way for any life to be. The second is a more technical assumption – I’ll call it the Axiom of Transitivity for Better Than – which holds that for any three choices, if the first option is better than the second, and the second option is better than the third, then the first option must be better than the third.‘The Axiom of Transitivity for Better Than’ generates a decision procedure for identifying the best of any finite set of options. Compare the two at a time. If the first is better, throw the second out. Then compare the third with the first. If the third is better, throw the first out. Proceed in this way, always choosing the best of each set of two alternatives. On this basis, if the Axiom of Transitivity for Better Than is true, we can determine the best of any finite set of n options, on the basis of n-1 pairwise comparisons.Many people have challenged the first assumption in one of four ways. Some have pointed out that some options might be equally good, so there is no single best option. Others have suggested that some alternatives might be only roughly comparable, or on a par. On this view, two alternatives could be in the same ballpark, say the genius of Einstein or Mozart, or a legal career versus an academic career, without one being better than the other, or their being exactly equally good. Still, others have suggested that in some rare cases two alternatives can be completely incomparable. And finally, some have noted that among an infinite number of possibilities, there might be no best one, just as there is no largest number in the infinite sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, …HideWhat is the author’s tone when he is talking about how parents behave in the first two paragraphs?FactualIronicalCriticalSatirical

1/2

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.