One of these is NOT an instances upon which a superior court can quash the verdict of a lower courtQuestion 9Answera.Undue delayb.Ultra viresc.Lack of jurisdictiond.Vagueness
Question
One of these is NOT an instances upon which a superior court can quash the verdict of a lower courtQuestion 9Answera.Undue delayb.Ultra viresc.Lack of jurisdictiond.Vagueness
Solution
The option that is NOT an instance upon which a superior court can quash the verdict of a lower court is:
d. Vagueness
Explanation:
a. Undue delay - A superior court can quash a verdict of a lower court if there has been an undue delay in the proceedings, which might have caused injustice.
b. Ultra vires - If a lower court has acted beyond its powers (ultra vires), a superior court can quash its verdict.
c. Lack of jurisdiction - If a lower court has given a verdict in a matter that was outside its jurisdiction, a superior court can quash the verdict.
d. Vagueness - This is not a legal ground upon which a superior court can quash the verdict of a lower court. A verdict may be unclear or vague, but this in itself is not a reason for a superior court to quash it. The verdict should be wrong in law or there should be a miscarriage of justice for a superior court to quash it.
Similar Questions
The lower court has passed an order in a criminal case. However the High Courtfeels that the correct procedure has not been followed and goes through that caseagain.Which jurisdiction is the High Court exercising in the above situation
In all cases not within the exclusive jurisdiction of any court, tribunal, person or body exercising jurisdiction or any court, tribunal, person or body exercising judicial or quasi-judicial functions;
A writ issued by a Superior Court, at its discretion, directing a lower court to deliver the record in the case before it is is calledQuestion 1Answera.Injunctionb.Certioraric.Mandamusd.Prohibition
The constitutional guarantee that criminal arrests and trials must meet certain minimum standards of fairness is the definition of:Group of answer choicesdue process.void of vagueness doctrine.extreme justice.wobbler.
Courts of general jurisdiction have the authority to hear both trial and appellate court proceedingsGroup of answer choicesTrueFalse
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.