Multiple Choice QuestionThe African countries that have not experienced sharp declines in their elephant populations have been those that assigned elephant property rights toMultiple choice question.no one.foreign tourists.local villages.the government.the United Nations.
Question
Multiple Choice QuestionThe African countries that have not experienced sharp declines in their elephant populations have been those that assigned elephant property rights toMultiple choice question.no one.foreign tourists.local villages.the government.the United Nations.
Solution
The correct answer is: local villages.
This is because when local communities are given the rights to the elephants, they have a vested interest in their survival. They can benefit economically from tourism and other activities related to elephants, which gives them an incentive to protect the animals and their habitats. This has been seen in countries like Namibia and Zimbabwe, where community-based conservation efforts have helped to stabilize or even increase elephant populations.
Similar Questions
Multiple Select QuestionSelect all that applyVillagers in some African countries organized very effective patrols to protect and conserve elephants when ______.Multiple select question.local villagers could keep the money from selling hunting rightslocal villagers could keep the money from taking tourists on safarisproperty rights were given to the villagersvillagers were given tax reductions by protecting the elephants
Renee is writing a speech about threats to the global elephant population. How would you best combine her two related main points?I. Elephants are endangered animals.II. Habitat loss and the ivory trade threaten the elephant population.Multiple choice question.Habitat loss threatens the elephant population. Ivory trade threatens the elephant population.Habitat loss and the ivory trade have caused elephants to become endangered.Elephants are harmed by habitat loss and the ivory trade.Elephants are just one animal that has become endangered due to habitat loss and the ivory trade.
Read this excerpt from a passage. Unfortunately, saving elephants had a negative economic effect on some people. In 1999, in response to pressure from business interests that were losing money because of the ban on the ivory trade, CITES allowed limited trade in stockpiled tusks. Ivory that already had been harvested from elephants could once again be bought and sold. But disaster for the African elephant followed. Poachers, or illegal hunters, rushed to kill more elephants. Many people had foreseen that illegal trading of ivory would flourish again if any trading at all were allowed. Following the CITES decision, African elephants died in large numbers. A 2014 New York Times editorial reported that approximately 30,000 to 35,000 African elephants were killed each year. Only a complete ban of the ivory trade can save the African elephant from extinction. Which type of logical fallacy appears in this excerpt? Fallacy of the single cause Cherry picking Reversing causal direction Post hoc fallacy
Habitat loss is the primary cause of decreasingMultiple choice question.pollution.biodiversity.eutrophication.glaciers.
Multiple Choice QuestionA country whose consumers are less likely to purchase nonessential products because they have a low per-capita income is considered to be ______.Multiple choice question.an economically-advanced countryan industrialized countrya developed countrya less-developed country
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.