Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?A.They can offer historians a firsthand interpretation of an important event.B.They can reveal to a historian exactly how people of an ancient culture lived.C.They can act as hard evidence to prove whether a society used a particular tool.D.They can provide a general summary of evidence other historians have discovered.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

What is one advantage a primary source has over a secondary source?A.A primary source is typically free of outside interpretation.B.A primary source is generally unbiased.C.A primary source is written after the fact.D.A primary source combines several different accounts of an event.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

How is historical evidence useful to a historian?A.It prevents a historian from relying on historiography.B.It can support a historian's conclusions.C.It allows a historian to think chronologically.D.It can help a historian avoid detecting bias in a source.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

Which of the following is the best definition for secondary source?A.A timeline describing the major parts of an eventB.A diary entry written by a person who witnessed an eventC.A photograph taken at an event by a trained historianD.A description of an event written long after it took placeSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

Select the correct answer.Which of these is the best definition of a secondary source? A. a summary of other sources that can be used as evidence in a text B. a firsthand account of an event or time period that has been recorded in print C. live recordings of events that can be shared and copied by researchers D. a source that interprets, analyzes, or synthesis firsthand accounts of events or time periods

What is one example of a primary source?A.A book by a historianB.The ConstitutionC.A magazine articleD.A textbookSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS