Which statement about correlation and causation is true? Correlation always implies causation. Causation always implies correlation. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Causation and correlation are synonymous terms.
Question
Which statement about correlation and causation is true? Correlation always implies causation. Causation always implies correlation. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation. Causation and correlation are synonymous terms.
Solution
The correct statement about correlation and causation is: "Correlation does not necessarily imply causation."
Here's why:
-
Correlation is a statistical measure that describes the degree to which two variables move in relation to each other. If two variables are correlated, it means that as one changes, there's a predictable change in the other. However, this doesn't mean that one variable is causing the other to change.
-
Causation, on the other hand, is a cause-and-effect relationship. If A causes B, then a change in A will always result in a change in B.
-
The statement "Correlation always implies causation" is incorrect because, as explained above, just because two variables are correlated doesn't mean one is causing the other to change. There could be other factors at play, or it could be a coincidence.
-
The statement "Causation always implies correlation" is also incorrect. While it's true that if A causes B, then A and B are likely to be correlated, it's not always the case. There could be other factors influencing B that disrupt the correlation.
-
The statement "Causation and correlation are synonymous terms" is incorrect. As explained above, correlation and causation have different meanings in statistics.
-
Therefore, the statement "Correlation does not necessarily imply causation" is the correct one. It's possible for two variables to be correlated without there being a cause-and-effect relationship between them.
Similar Questions
Which of the following statements is TRUE?Only a correlation equal to 0 implies causation.A correlation of 1 or -1 implies causation. If the two variables of a scatterplot are strongly related, this condition implies causation between the two variables.A high correlation is insufficient to establish causation on its own.
How is historical causation similar to correlation?A.Both involve events that occur during the same historical period.B.Both involve two or more events that lead to the same outcome.C.Both involve events that are a result of the same stimulus.D.Both involve two or more events that occur at the same time.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Which statement about correlation is FALSE?The correlation of a data set can be positive, negative, or 0.Correlation is used to define the variables of only non-linearly related data sets.Correlation between the variables of the data set can be measured.Correlation is the degree to which the two variables of a data set resemble each other.
True or False: Correlational research can be used to imply cause and effect.Question 5Select one:TrueFalse
Correlation studies are useful in that they show causation to help us better understand how two variables relate to one another. Group of answer choicesTrue False
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.