Respond to at least two other group members' drafts to leave them feedback. Copy and paste the critique points from below, and include a critique of these topics in each of your feedback: The articles: Does the essay include the 2 sources' titles and authors? Are the titles capitalized correctly (all major words capitalized)? If the source is an article, is the title in "Quotation Marks?" Summary: Did the student correctly use the Article Summary Format as the 1st sentence for each article? Can you fully understand the main points of the articles? If not, what parts are confusing? What else can the student do in order to better summarize this source? Examples of Peer Review Comments - "You did not use the Article Summary Format - take a look at the assignment sheet and make sure to follow the format given" "The 5th line was confusing, and it was unclear what you were saying about homelessness - are you saying that they are at fault? Can you clarify that sentence?" Analysis: Did the student offer a deep analysis of the articles? Was there a "wow" moment where you were surprised or moved by their analysis? If not, what suggestions can you make? MLA: Are the quotes not just copied and pasted quotes? Are the in-text citations and Works Cited all correctly done in MLA format? Overall comments: Any other thoughts about this essay and the summary? How did it help you with the YPAR project? Please make sure that your comments are critical, but not harsh. Also, be specific in your criticism and suggestions. You want to hear about your mistakes before you turn in your final drafts where I will be making those criticisms for negative points! You'll earn up to 5 points for posting a draft (must be a full draft, not an incomplete draft) and points for fully responding to at least two peers.

With the article in mind, consider how you take criticism on your writing. Do you struggle to get through the notes without feeling attacked? Do you accept all suggested changes without considering whether there may be an even better alternative?

The subtitles of a critique paperQuestion 17Select one:a.Introduction and Recommendationb.Introduction and Conclusionc.Summary onlyd.Summary and critique

Write a short reflection on how feedback has informed your final Critical Commentary submission. Feedback includes: general class feedback; individual feedback on Assignment 2.1 Initial Analysis; any other feedback in tutorials and lectures, from your tutor and/or the unit-coordinator, whether received individually or as part of small or larger groups. Tutor feedback: You identify and discuss some of the key techniques in the sequence chosen, such as tracking shots and mise-en-scène. However, aim to be more precise in the use of terminology. You do a good job of describing the effects of the different techniques noted. I would have liked to see a bit more analysis of the techniques and their affect. Overall, good written expression, but there is occasionally some awkward word choices. Proofreading by reading the work out loud will help with that. Remember also that titles of texts ought to be italicised.

Discussion ForumThis Unit focuses on Reflective Writing. After reading the study materials in the learning guide, write a few paragraphs about the course assignments so far. What tasks did the assignments involve? How did you complete the tasks? What strengths and weaknesses were revealed (with regards to writing in English) from these activities? How do you propose to address the areas of improvement in the coming weeks? Engage in a thoughtful discussion with your classmates, respecting and valuing their perspectives. Offer constructive feedback and actively engage with your peers. Discussion should not exceed 300 words. Please include a word count. Following the APA standard, use references and in-text citations for the textbook and any other sources.

3. Discuss the value of academic feedback from a student perspective.