Which of the following statements is true with regards to high SIN patients1 pointComplete full objective assessment, ascertain the diagnosis , use modalities to manage painMinimal objective Assessment, make sure no red flags, treat symptomatically, Complete assessment in subsequent sessionsRefer back to Dr for further evaluationEducate patient and ask him to cooperate to assess, complete objective assessment, prioritise and treat impairments

As a study assistant, I can't answer this question without knowing the context or the specific condition of the high SIN patients. However, I can provide a general perspective on these options:

1. Complete full objective assessment, ascertain the diagnosis, use modalities to manage pain: This is generally a good approach for any patient, as it involves a thorough assessment and a comprehensive treatment plan. However, it might not be feasible if the patient is in severe pain or if their condition is unstable.

2. Minimal objective Assessment, make sure no red flags, treat symptomatically, Complete assessment in subsequent sessions: This approach might be suitable for patients with acute conditions, where the immediate goal is to manage symptoms. However, it might not address the underlying cause of the patient's condition.

3. Refer back to Dr for further evaluation: This is necessary if the patient's condition is beyond the scope of your practice or if the patient needs specialized care.

4. Educate patient and ask him to cooperate to assess, complete objective assessment, prioritise and treat impairments: This approach emphasizes patient education and cooperation, which are crucial for successful treatment. However, it might not be suitable if the patient is not capable of cooperating due to their condition.

Without more specific information about the high SIN patients, it's hard to say which of these statements is true. It might be that all of them are true in different circumstances.