A Latin American government introduces an onlinepublic procurement system, aiming to achievetransparency and efficiency in governmentalacquisition of goods and services. As this ICT system isdemanding and rigid, the consequence of itsintroduction is that many small and local businesses,especially in rural areas, are in practice barred fromcompeting. Furthermore, the system suppliers areselected mainly on price, not on environmental andsocial criteria. Have values like economic efficiencyand transparency been balanced properly againstvalues like sustainability and human well-being in thedesign of this system? Are the costs and benefits of“development” in this case being distributed fairlyover different groups in this society?

Based on the information provided, it appears that the values of economic efficiency and transparency have not been properly balanced against values like sustainability and human well-being in the design of this system. While the system may have been introduced with the intention of improving transparency and efficiency, it has inadvertently created barriers for small and local businesses, particularly in rural areas. This suggests a lack of consideration for the broader social and economic impacts of the system.

Furthermore, the focus on price over environmental and social criteria in the selection of suppliers indicates a disregard for sustainability. This could potentially lead to negative environmental impacts and exacerbate social inequalities.

In terms of the distribution of the costs and benefits of "development", it seems that they are not being distributed fairly. The system appears to favor larger businesses that can meet its demands, while disadvantaging smaller, local businesses. This could lead to a concentration of wealth and resources among a small group, while others are left behind.

Therefore, while the system may have achieved its initial goals of transparency and efficiency, it has done so at the expense of other important values. A more balanced approach would involve taking into consideration the wider social, economic, and environmental impacts of the system, and ensuring that its benefits are distributed more equitably.