Assignment – STAT8061 This is an independent assignment. Each student is responsible to maintain the integrity of their own work. Sharing/Copying/Crowdsourcing will result with academic penalties. STUDENT INFORMATION Present this assignment using MS Word/PDF for the report and include the Excel file with all tabs created. Each assignment must be upload via the EConestoga portal by the due date/time. LATE SUBMISSIONS: Late penalties will be applied immediately past the deadline Late submissions received will result in the following penalties to your grade for the assessment: o 1 day late - 20% cumulative penalty o 2 days late - 40% cumulative penalty . Assignments later than two (2) calendar days will not be accepted and a grade of zero (0) will be applied Academic Integrity: This assessment must be completed individually. All assignments will be scanned to detect plagiarism and use of generative AI. -All work must be your own and must be written in your own words with sources properly cited. Sentences and paragraphs copied directly from other sources will be processed as Academic Integrity offenses for Plagiarism. -Use of Generative AI, including Co-Pilot, is not permitted in any capacity for this assessment. (*modify and specify parameters when applicable). -Students are responsible for maintaining security of their work and not sharing their work with any other students. -Conestoga’s Academic Offences Policy will be enforced Total mark out of 100. SCENARIO: 1. (15 points) Report format (Introduction to assignment, content page, raw data, answers to all questions with supporting calculation/functions etc., conclusion, proper formatting and spacing etc.). Inclusion of the supporting EXCEL file and also the WORD/PDF file containing the report. 2. Pick your own sample-data for students’ weight (lbs) from two classes (Class 1, Class 2). It is assumed that both Class1 and Class 2 contain 400 students each. a. (10 points) Guidelines for picking raw-data: i. Create continuous data between 100.99 lbs to 179.99 lbs (2nd last digit of all weights should be same as of your section number. For example for section#1 - 125.18, 167.12, 134.10 - for section#3 - 160.31, 154.39, 179.35 - and so on ii. Sample-1: size of 52 to 58 students from class-1 (400 students) iii. Sample-2: size of 46 to 50 students from class-2 (500 students) iv. Keep one-gender’s total between 30%-45% and the other’s 55%-70% in both classes. Gender ratio cannot be same for both samples. v. If you were to create this sample data (from the classes that contain 400 students each) - explain the sampling method (for sample-1 and sample-2) that you would use to create these samples. b. Include your raw data just after “content” page in your report 3. Answer the below questions in a report form. Include all relevant graphs/methods/calculation/rationale etc. in a sequence with your answers. a. (5 points) Is the mean weight of male students in both samples the same? b. (10 po

Plagiarizing an assignment can result in:Question 29Select one:a.Failing the assignmentb.Failing the coursec.Getting suspendedd.Getting expellede.All of the above

CS304 – Object Oriented Programming Assignment No.1 (Graded) Maximum Marks: 20 Instructions Due Date: 29 April 2024 The purpose of this assignment is to give you hands-on practice. It is expected that students will solve the assignment themselves. The following rules will apply during the evaluation of the assignment. ● Cheating from any source will result in zero marks in the assignment. ● The submitted assignment does NOT open or the file is corrupted. ● No assignment after the due date will be accepted. ● Students can submit HTML, Images & Plain text only in this inline Mode. You may also insert an image file/table. ● DOC/pdf File uploading option will not be available) in inline assignment submission. Uploading Assignment Instruction Follow the given instructions to submit an inline assignment. ● You can use MS Visio/ MS Paint for drawing the Class Diagram etc. ● Students can insert the images in the following formats. ● Images and tables can be inserted using the following highlighted option in the interface. Objective & Learning Outcome Objectives: The objectives of this assignment are to: • Identify the main objects (entities). • Find the necessary attributes and functions associated with each object. • Identify the relationships among objects. • Construct a comprehensive class diagram. Learning Outcomes: After completing this assignment, students will be able to: • Develop a UML class diagram. Question (20 Marks ) Scenario: A freelance marketplace is an online platform that connects freelancers with clients who need specific projects/jobs completed. These platforms serve as intermediaries that help both parties find each other, and ensure the secure exchange of services and payments. On the freelance marketplace, there can be two types of users: one is a client who posts the jobs or projects, and the other is a freelancer who bids to complete those projects. After winning the project, freelancers complete the project and submit it. After evaluating the project, the client approves the project, and then payment is released to the freelancer. Based on the above scenario there are the following key features of a freelancing platform: 1. Freelancers create profiles that include their skills, experience, and portfolio of work. 2. Clients post projects or job descriptions, mentioning the skills required, project timelines and budget etc. Freelancers can then decide if they wish to apply or bid for the project. 3. A freelancer can bid on the project. Clients then review these bids and select a freelancer based on factors such as price, experience, and previous reviews etc. 4. Payment may be released to the freelancer only after the client approves the

Object Oriented Programming - JavaDiv I – Batch 2“Teacher Assessment - College”Note : Marks : 251. Announcement Date: 30-11-2023.2. Due date: 06-12-2023 till 08:00 pm.3. The assignment to be done “individually” or with group of “three students” maximum.4. Assignment must be implemented in “Java” only.5. Assume data types and data, wherever it is required.6. Though viva will be at different times for different students, the submission deadline is same forall.7. No Copying / sharing of code are allowed for this assignment. If any such case identified, theoriginal author and person who has copied both will be “penalized” equally and “zero marks”will be awarded.8. Dates for assignment viva will be announced later.Task :A. Develop a JDBC project for relation “College”. Use PostgreSQL as database.B. Write a “POJO class College” for private attributes given in following table with mentioned “keyconstraints”. Constructor, getters, setters and toString method must be there.C. Create a controller class for following methods. Use SQL query only to perform operations in allmethods. Create relation using SQL query only. Enrollment number must be auto generated seriallyfor all students.1. Create student (student name, division, gender, marks).2. Print student (enrollment no). {Print specific student data.}3. Calculate grade (student name). {Marks = 75 to 100 Grade A, Marks = 60 to 74 Grade B, Marks= 40 to 59 Grade C, Marks = 0 to 39 Grade D}4. Find students by gender (gender). {Print specific data.}5. Add Bonus marks (enrollment no, bonus marks). {Add bonus marks in original marks.}6. Change division (student name). {Change division and print.}7. Print students in range (min marks, max marks). {Print selected data.}D. Create a service class for calling all above methods in “menu driven” pattern.Relation :- CollegeEnrollmentNumber (PK)Student Name(NN) Division (NN) Gender (NN) Marks (NN)… ……Mr. Akhilesh LungeFaculty

Assignment overview   Title: Literature ReviewIndividual assignment Assessment type: Academic Literature review Weighting: 40% Word count (or equivalent): 1500 words, excluding references.Due date: Wednesday, 3rd April 2024, due at Midday Submission procedure:  via Turnitin, add the relevant statement from the Turnitin Links to an external site.guide.Feedback date: 2-3 weeks after submission. Referencing style: APA 7 or Harvard  Assignment explanationCritical Analysis Literature Review - up to 1500 words – excluding reference list.individual assignment 40%Due: Week 6This paper takes the form of a critical analysis of a selected topic (see below).You are required to choose a topic from the list below and then chooseone aspect or issue within the topic. This assessment word limit is 1,500words (excluding references), so your analysis must be selective.Once you have chosen an issue from the topics on the list below, you are required toread the appropriate academic literature to enable you to criticallyanalyse, compare, and make recommendations. Your paper should include a minimum of 20 academic references - this does not include websites.Choose an issue from one of the topics below a particular issue to undertake aliterature review (Note - these are topic areas below, not issues):- Job Crafting- Psychological Contract- Career Management- Mentoring TaskSee SyllabusInstructionsSee SyllabusRubricYou will be marked according to the rubric. View the rubric to support your completion of this assignment. RubricCritical Literature ReviewCritical Literature ReviewCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIdentification of key issues6 to >4.74 PtsSuperior and comprehensive identification of the all issues.4.74 to >4.14 PtsThorough identification of most of the issues.4.14 to >3.54 PtsSatisfactory identification of the several issues.3.54 to >2.94 PtsBasic identification of the key issues and problems presented.2.94 to >0 PtsPoor comprehension and/or identification of the issues.6 ptsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAnalysis and synthesisIncludes the ability to find, use and disseminate information in a digital world.20 to >15.8 PtsOutstanding development of the case with excellent details. Synthesises in-depth information from relevant sources.15.8 to >13.8 PtsLogical development of the case with thorough details. Synthesises information from relevant sources.13.8 to >11.8 PtsReasonable development of the case with adequate details. Summarises information from relevant sources.11.8 to >9.8 PtsBasic development of the case with few details. Presents information from relevant sources.9.8 to >0 PtsLittle or no development of the case with irrelevant details. Presents information from irrelevant sources.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeInsights10 to >7.9 PtsCreative and original insights developed from the earlier analyses with alternative views offered showing connections among ideas and using information, theories and/or frameworks from a variety of sources.7.9 to >6.9 PtsClear insights developed from the earlier analyses showing sound evidence of understanding of ideas and information, theories and/or frameworks from different sources.6.9 to >5.9 PtsAdequate insights developed with links to previous analyses demonstrating good understanding, theories and/or frameworks of ideas and information.5.9 to >4.9 PtsBasic insights provided with opportunity to be better supported by analyses, theories and/or frameworks.4.9 to >0 PtsNo or little insights provided or shown. Poor attempt to link to analyses, theories and/or frameworks.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomePresentation and referencing2 to >1.58 PtsThe analysis is logically structured, easy to understand. It contains highly informative details and excellent use of referencing.1.58 to >1.38 PtsThe analysis is well structured, unambiguous. Contains informative details and very good use of referencing.1.38 to >1.18 PtsThe analysis has a clear structure, is generally unambiguous with adequate details. Good referencing.1.18 to >0.98 PtsThe analysis has an implicit structure, requires some reading between the lines, and needs editing. Adequate referencing.0.98 to >0 PtsThe analysis has an illogical or no structure and/or is difficult to understand. Few details are provided. Referencing requires significant attention.2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeGrammar and expression2 to >1.58 PtsUses sophisticated, expressive and appropriate language that skilfully communicates meaning to readers eloquently and is grammatically error free1.58 to >1.38 PtsUses expressive and appropriate language that competently communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency and is grammatically correct1.38 to >1.18 PtsUses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity. Attention to detail is evident.1.18 to >0.98 PtsUses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to readers. The language is understandable but there may be significant room for grammatical improvement.0.98 to >0 PtsUses language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage.

Assignment requirementsAfter participating in the careers workshop activity (Week 2) and reflective writing workshop (Week 3), students will prepare a short 500 word piece discussing their career goals and career/study aspirations and how the study of accounting may (or may not) be useful in achieving those goals. This task will be due in Week 4 based on the due date listed below.Submission template: 22108 Sp23 A2 submission template Download 22108 Sp23 A2 submission template[word doc template] Download this file, then double click on the template to create your file. Submissions that are not using the template will not be marked. If you do not have Microsoft Word on your computer, follow the instructions on this UTS website to obtain a free subscription.Due date: Tuesday 29th August at 11.59pm. Note that the due date is earlier than the "available to" date you see in Canvas - the 2nd date is the last date you can submit but it will attract a late submission penalty. Assignment structureThere is no mandatory structure - but in Workshop 3 we provided the following recommended structuredescription of your career aspirations and goals (estimate 1 paragraph)discussion of your feelings related to your goals, any external pressures, any insights that came from the careers activities and any feelings related to the study of accounting (estimate 1 long or 2 shorter paragraphs)evaluation - how does the study of accounting fit into your career goals and aspirations (estimate 1 long or 2 shorter paragraphs)conclusions - given your evaluation of the role of accounting in your career, what strategies will you employ to achieve your designed mark/grade in the subject (estimate 1 paragraph)Following the recommended structure will also help you meet the assessment criteria below.Please follow this submission template. 22108 Sp23 A2 submission template Download 22108 Sp23 A2 submission template[word doc template] Download this file, then double click on the template to create your file. Submissions that are not using the template will not be marked and 0 marks will be awarded. If you do not have Microsoft Word on your computer, follow the instructions on this UTS website to obtain a free subscription. For Stage 1, the team conducted checks to ensure each student was using the correct template and gave students a chance to re-submit without penalty. For Stage 2 - there will be no checking or follow ups - it is your responsibility to submit the format in the correct format.The word limit is 500 words for this task. We do not have a 10% over/under leeway - when set a target, students should learn to work with that target. We will accept 1-2% over the word limit. Students can be under the word limit as much as they like. Going over the word limit will result in penalties being applied. 2.01 to 5% over and there will be a 1 mark deduction, 6% or more over and there will be a 2 mark deduction.  Submission informationThere is NO COVER SHEET for the assignment. Please follow this submission template. 22108 Sp23 A2 submission template Download 22108 Sp23 A2 submission template[word doc template]. Download this file, then double click on the template to create your file. Submissions that are not using the template will not be marked. If you do not have Microsoft Word on your computer, follow the instructions on this UTS website to obtain a free subscription. Only word documents are accepted - you will not be able to submit a PDF, pages file or other format like a link to a Google Doc. If you are using Google Docs, please export it as a Word document. Academic integrityIt is imperative at UTS that students complete their work with integrity - completing your own work and referencing the contributions of others. UTS conducts regular checks and investigations into work that may breach our integrity standards - this can include plagiarism, improper paraphrasing, collusion and contract cheating (engaging another person to prepare work for you). Turnitin will be run on all submissions and you are able to view your Turnitin report. No references are required in this assessment task because we are asking you to write about your own thoughts, feelings and perceptions. If you do choose to use any outside sources, please use in-text referencing in accordance with APA 7 - refer to the UTS APA 7 Library guide for more information.By submitting your assessment task, you are certifying thatthis is your own work in your own wordsyou have appropriately recognised the work of others (if used) through appropriate APA 7 referencingthat you have not published or shared your completed work to any notes sharing sites (as this is a breach of UTS' rules related to misconduct because it is helping others cheat)that the work has not been previously submitted for assessment in this subject or any other  (if you are repeating AAA, you should write an entirely new/fresh reflection)Your assessment submission will be processed through Turnitin. Where the teaching staff have concerns about whether you have completed your own work (for example, your document has low editing time, a low version number or does not appear to be written by you for any other reason) - you may be asked to provide documentation showing the drafting process you have undertaken in reaching your final submission. This process is similar to real-world accounting, where documents showing the preparation of the financial statements, accounting advice to clients, tax advice or the audit report/opinion are commonly referred to as 'working papers' and must be produced by regulatory bodies on request. For students, your working papers for this assignment can include notes, drafts, access to cloud-stored documents in services such as Google Drive or OneDrive, or internet search history related to the assessment task. It is recommended that you retain these notes, drafts etc for at least 4 months after the end of the teaching session (businesses and accountants in Australia are required to keep their working papers for 7 years). Failure to be able to produce material on request from your coordinator, Academic Integrity Officer or Responsible Academic Officer of the university may be used in misconduct allegations against you. Any request will be made to you in writing to your UTS email address.