What is the missing (unexpressed) premise or conclusion for the following argument?  If it is reasonable to explain the effectiveness of homeopathy by appeal to some currently unknown mechanism, then there must be solid evidence that homeopathic treatments work.  However, there is no such evidence.

What does it claim to remedy.c) How accepted  is it as  a viable alternative/complement to conventional medicine.-Chiropractic

In the early years of the U.S., medical care often lacked a firm foundation in scientific knowledge, leading to treatments that:Question 9Answera.were highly effectiveb.caused more harm than benefitc.were revolutionary breakthroughsd.were exclusively herbal remedies

18.  There was a survey being conducted wherein 1,500 male adults were asked about attitudes toward the so-called alternative medicine such as acupuncture, massage therapy and the like. Among the 1,500 respondents, 660 of them said that they would use alternative medicine if the well-known traditional medicine would not produce the results they wanted. The researcher wants to determine if these data provide enough evidence to suggest less than half of all male adults would use alternative medicine if traditional medicine would not produce the desired results. 5% was used as the significance level. Based on your own understanding, which is the right conclusion for this test?*A. Since the p-value = 0.001 < 0.05, I will reject Ho since there is enough evidence to suggest that the proportion is less than half.B. Since the p-value = 0.001 < 0.05, I will fail to reject Ho since there is not enough evidence to suggest that the proportion is less than half.C. Since p-value = 0.001 > 0.05, I will reject Ho since there is enough evidence to suggest that the proportion is less than half.D. Since p-value = 0.001 < 0.05, I will fail to reject Ho since there is enough evidence to suggest that the proportion is less than half.

A double-blind experiment is conducted to investigate the side effects of hormone replacement therapy for women with menopausal symptoms. The experiment randomly assigns more than 16,000 American women to either a hormone treatment or a placebo. After five years, the HRT study finds no significant difference in the proportion of women developing breast cancer and heart disease. Researchers decide, based on this finding, to allow the study to continue. As the null hypothesis was not rejected, there is a chance that the researchers made a type II error.Given the type of error made in this situation, what could researchers do to reduce the risk of this error?

Failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is false.