Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

What impact did Oralism in deaf schools have on deaf students' general education?1 pointStudents' academic performance went upStudents' academic performance went downStudents' academic performance stayed relatively the same.

Question

What impact did Oralism in deaf schools have on deaf students' general education?1 pointStudents' academic performance went upStudents' academic performance went downStudents' academic performance stayed relatively the same.

🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

Oralism in deaf schools had a significant impact on deaf students' general education. The primary focus of Oralism is on teaching deaf students to speak and read lips, often at the expense of sign language. This approach can be challenging for deaf students as it does not cater to their natural mode of communication, which is visual and spatial, rather than auditory.

As a result, many deaf students struggled with this method of instruction. It often led to a decrease in their academic performance. They had difficulty understanding and keeping up with lessons, which were primarily delivered orally. This often resulted in a lack of understanding of the subject matter, leading to lower grades and academic achievement.

Moreover, the emphasis on oral skills often led to a neglect of other areas of study. Deaf students spent a significant amount of time learning to speak and read lips, which left less time for other subjects. This further contributed to their lower academic performance.

Therefore, the impact of Oralism in deaf schools on deaf students' general education was generally negative, leading to a decrease in students' academic performance.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

20. Which of the following is the BEST explanation for how ASL manage to survive?1 pointMany deaf schools rejected OralismDeaf kids used it on the sly, even though it was prohibitedCongress passed a law outlawing OralismParents protested nation-wide and forced schools to change their teaching techniques

Which of the following was NOT a reason why ASL made a comeback in the early 1900s?1 pointThe advent of silent films, which often portrayed Deaf actors using sign languageDeaf students organized nation-wide protests against OralismDeaf schools realized that letting deaf kids learn and use ASL helped teachers to better teach OralismThe NAD helped to promote ASL in the public eye.

Which event almost eradicated sign language?Group of answer choicesAmericans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 1990Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone invention, 1876Deaf President Now! (DPN), 1988International Congress on Education of the Deaf, 1880

Where was the first public (free) deaf school established?   Group of answer choicesFranceMexicoSpainAmericaBritain

Based on the article, the reader can infer that __________.A.Laurent Clerc and Thomas Gallaudet did not agree on the most effective methods for teaching people with hearing lossB.passing legislation to protect the rights of people with hearing loss was a simple and quick task to accomplishC.children with hearing loss living in the U.S. preferred to use their own forms of hand signs at school rather than ASLD.there was no single widespread method of communication among people in the U.S. with hearing loss prior to the creation of ASL

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.