What are group members engaging in when they withhold their reservations and criticisms for the sake of consensus?
Question
What are group members engaging in when they withhold their reservations and criticisms for the sake of consensus?
Solution
Group members are engaging in a phenomenon known as "groupthink" when they withhold their reservations and criticisms for the sake of consensus.
Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people, in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome.
Here are the steps that lead to groupthink:
- The group members form a strong, cohesive group.
- The group's desire for unanimity overrides their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action.
- Group members try to minimize conflict and reach a consensus decision without critical evaluation of alternative viewpoints.
- Active suppression of dissenting viewpoints and isolation of their proponents.
- The lack of systematic procedures for search and appraisal of alternatives.
- Belief in the inherent morality of the group and ignoring moral consequences of decisions.
- Stereotyping those who oppose the group's views as weak, evil, biased, spiteful, disfigured, impotent, or stupid.
- Direct pressure on any member who expresses strong arguments against any of the group's stereotypes, illusions, or commitments, making clear that this type of dissent is contrary to what is expected of all loyal members.
- Self-censorship of deviations from the apparent group consensus.
- Shared illusion of unanimity concerning judgments conforming to the majority view.
- Emergence of self-appointed mindguards— members who protect the group from adverse information that might shatter their shared complacency about the effectiveness and morality of their decisions.
Similar Questions
There are continual struggles in society to determine which group is dominant and who has the right to speak for its members.Group of answer choicestruefalse
Can disagreement amongst groups be productive? In what circumstances? Can you bring examples of productive (or unproductive!) dissent and compromise from any past collaborative projects or experiences? What are the most important elements of successful collaboration?
The chapter reading by Henriques (2017) described various stakeholder engagement techniques. Which technique was not listed?Group of answer choicesFocus groupsReferendumInterviewsRound tablesPublic hearings
Question 10A team may perceive itself to have reached a consensus that does not exist, otherwise known as a false consensus, when:1 pointthe team takes all alternatives into account sufficientlyteam members overestimate the level of shared beliefs, values, and opinions across membersteam members are willing to critique each other’s ideasteam members have a low level of confidence
Strongly cohesive groups may assume that their decisions can’t be incorrect and to put pressure on all group members to strongly support the group’s decisions. This is known as ________.Select one:deindividuationa social dilemmagroupthinkgroup polarization
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.