Ambidexterity refers to being able to address market needs on the one hand andtechnological challenges on the other.1 pointTrueFalse
Question
Ambidexterity refers to being able to address market needs on the one hand andtechnological challenges on the other.1 pointTrueFalse
Solution
False.
Ambidexterity in a general sense refers to the ability to use both the right and left hand equally well. In a business context, organizational ambidexterity refers to a company's ability to manage and balance both explorative and exploitative activities, i.e., to innovate while also maintaining current operations. It does not specifically refer to addressing market needs and technological challenges, although these could be part of a company's explorative and exploitative activities.
Similar Questions
A coreimpetus behind ambidexterity is that it can enable firms to take advantage of innovationopportunities that require leveraging existing firm assets and capabilities.1 pointTrueFalse
What is the definition of ambidexterity in terms ofinnovation and strategy? 1 pointthestate of being equally adapted in the use of both the left and the right handanorganization's ability to be efficient in its management of today's business and also adaptable for coping with tomorrow's changingdemand Capability for firms to be able to simultaneously align themselves to theneeds of mature markets and young markets abalance between explorations and exploitation
Organisational ambidexterity involves activities that include…a.Innovationb.Investmentc.Employee selectiond.Multi-divisional design
Which idea is not consistent with ambidexterity?1 pointEstablishing strategic intent that brings together old and newBuilding identity around common vision, values and cultureForming multiple semi-autonomous unitsWidespread application of standard processes and systems
This increasing breadth of research on strategic alliances and their role in ambidexterity leads to a growing diversity in theoretical perspectives, with researchers using perspectives with contradictory assumptions and findings. For instance, some studies apply the micro-foundations perspective or dynamic capability theory to explain how strategic alliances are formed to promote ambidexterity (Heracleous et al., 2017; Seepana et al., 2020), whereas others adopt a relational view or transaction cost perspective to relate strategic alliances with ambidexterity (Cofré-Bravo et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2014). This causes theoretical tensions associated with the partial use of findings, which impedes cumulative knowledge-building within this important domain of research. Furthermore, this has also led to a serious problem of emphasizing what is already known instead of adding novel insights to the current body of knowledge (Rabetino et al., 2021).
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.