S sold to B a piano for ₱100,000. It was agreed that payment shall be made within ten (10) days. Has B the right to demand delivery even before he has paid?
Question
S sold to B a piano for ₱100,000. It was agreed that payment shall be made within ten (10) days. Has B the right to demand delivery even before he has paid?
Solution
Based on the given information, we can analyze the situation step by step:
- S sold a piano to B for ₱100,000.
- It was agreed that payment would be made within ten (10) days.
Now, let's address the question: Does B have the right to demand delivery before making the payment?
In general, the right to demand delivery before payment depends on the terms and conditions agreed upon by both parties during the sale. If there was no specific agreement regarding the timing of delivery and payment, it is common for the buyer to make the payment first before the seller delivers the item.
However, if there was a specific agreement between S and B that allowed B to demand delivery before making the payment, then B would indeed have the right to do so. It is important to review the terms and conditions of the sale agreement to determine the rights and obligations of both parties.
In summary, without further information about the specific terms and conditions agreed upon by S and B, it is difficult to determine whether B has the right to demand delivery before making the payment.
Similar Questions
Presentment for payment to be sufficient must be made - a. By the drawer or by some other person L f B r l b. To the person primarily liable on the instrument c. At any place d. On any day regardless of the time
Same facts as the preceding number, but the price is fixed at ₱1,000,000 without a statement of the price per square meter. Has B the right to enforce the contract with the corresponding reduction of the price to ₱900,000?
S sold to B a parcel of land with an area of 500 square meters at ₱2,000 per square meter. It turns out that the area is only 450 square meters. Has B the right to cancel or rescind the sale even if S is willing to accept a proportionate reduction of the price, or only ₱900,000?
Assume William entered into a sales contract with Lora Furniture Inc. and orders ten dining tables, which were custom made for him. Lora Furniture Inc. indicated later that it does not intend to fulfill the obligations under the contract. In this scenario, according to the UCC, as an alternative remedy for the breach of contract by Lora Furniture Inc., William can ________.Multiple choice question.reclaim goods in possession of the seller by making a demand within 10 days after receiving the indication. UCC 2-716issue a stop-delivery order to the seller. UCC 2-716sue the seller for causing emotional damages. UCC 2-716obtain specific performance of the contract where the goods are unique and cannot be obtained elsewhere. UCC 2-716
A, B, and C are partners in A & Company. A is the managing partner. X is indebted to the partnership for the amount of Php24,000. X is also indebted to B in the amount of Php12,000. Both debts are due and demandable. B was able to collect the amount of Php12,000 from X. While drinking on a Friday night, B told A that he was able to collect from X. The following day, A demanded B to give the amount he collected from X for the benefit of the partnership.Can A demand B to give to the partnership what he collected?Group of answer choicesYes. B should give Php12,000 to the partnership. Under the law, B should prioritize the partnership over his personal interest.Yes. B, as an ordinary partner, is required under the law to report to the partnership whatever benefit he received.No. B is not a managing partner, so he is not required to give what he received in favor of the partnership.No. B acted in good faith and even reported to A that he was able to collect from X.Both a and bBoth c and d
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.