Which of the following is false about “from-import” form of import?AThe syntax is: from modulename import identifierBThe namespace of imported module becomes part of importing moduleCThis form of import prevents name clashDNone of the Above

Sure, let's analyze each option step by step to determine which statement is false about the "from-import" form of import in Python.

1. Option A: The syntax is: from modulename import identifier

   • This statement is true. The correct syntax for this form of import is indeed from modulename import identifier.

2. Option B: The namespace of imported module becomes part of importing module

   • This statement is false. When you use the "from-import" form, only the specified identifiers are imported into the current namespace, not the entire module's namespace. For example, from math import sqrt only imports the sqrt function, not the entire math module.

3. Option C: This form of import prevents name clash

   • This statement is true to some extent. By importing specific identifiers, you can avoid potential name clashes with other identifiers in your code. However, if the imported identifier has the same name as an existing identifier in your code, it will still cause a name clash.

4. Option D: None of the Above

   • This statement would be true if all the previous statements were true. However, since we identified that Option B is false, this statement is not correct.

Therefore, the false statement about the "from-import" form of import is:

B. The namespace of imported module becomes part of importing module

The false statement about the "from-import" form of import is:

B. The namespace of the imported module becomes part of the importing module.

This statement is false because when you use the "from-import" form of import in Python, you're actually importing specific identifiers (like functions, variables, classes) from the module into your current namespace. You're not importing the entire namespace of the module.