Strengths of having the High Court in place to interpret disputes in legislation

Court Hierarchy (including Boards and Tribunals) 1. Every society has laws to ________________________________. 2. The legal process has three main purposes: (i) _________________________________________________ (ii) _________________________________________________ (iii) _________________________________________________ 3. The issues that can be heard in each court is known as a court’s _______________________. 4. There are four main reasons for having a court hierarchy: (i) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (ii) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (iii) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (iv) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5. Comment on the jurisdiction of each of the following courts: Civil Criminal Appeal Judge or Magistrate Jurisdiction Court of Petty Sessions Local Court Children’s Court Coroner’s Court Warden’s Court Compensation Court Drug Courts Liquor Licensing Court Family Court District Court Supreme Court Federal Court High Court Boards and Tribunals 1. Describe four differences between a court and a tribunal. (i) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (ii) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (iii) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (iv) ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

What useful functions in the legal process can separate and dissentingopinions have?Check all that apply1 pointThey can contribute to the development of the lawThey serve as a means for judges to express their individual opinions onissues remotely connected to the caseThey underscore the impartiality of judgesThey allow judges to avoid common deliberations

What sources of law would you review to determine the proceduree that a particular tribunal or agency must follow to ensure a fair hearing?

Which disputes are not normally within the jurisdiction of the CCMA, to arbitrate?Group of answer choicesa. Freedom of associationb. Disputes 30 days overduec. Compensation hearingsd. Unfair dismissals

The jurisdiction of the courts and their alternatives in contributing to case outcomes.The first part of your report will evaluate how dispute solving in both the criminal and civil courts compare with methods of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in contributing to case outcomes. The first section of this part of the report should present a detailed comparison of the civil and criminal court hierarchies and appeal routes. As part of your comparison you will need to give detailed explanations relating directly to the authorities selected and the case examples provided.To conclude this first section of the report you should provide a detailed conclusion, about how dispute solving in the courts compares with methods of ADR. Your conclusion must be supported and justified based on the facts and evidence presented in relation to the authorities discussed