Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Statements backed by good reasons are…OptionsBeyond all possible doubtWorthy of strong acceptanceNever falseTo be believed with certainty

Question

Statements backed by good reasons are…OptionsBeyond all possible doubtWorthy of strong acceptanceNever falseTo be believed with certainty

🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The statement "Statements backed by good reasons are worthy of strong acceptance" seems to be the most accurate.

Here's why:

  1. "Beyond all possible doubt": This is not necessarily true because even statements backed by good reasons can still be doubted. There's always room for skepticism and further inquiry in any field of study.

  2. "Worthy of strong acceptance": This is the most accurate option. If a statement is backed by good reasons, it means it has been well-researched and thought out. Therefore, it is worthy of strong acceptance.

  3. "Never false": This is not necessarily true. Even if a statement is backed by good reasons, it can still be false. The reasons might be based on incorrect data or faulty logic.

  4. "To be believed with certainty": This is not necessarily true. Even if a statement is backed by good reasons, there's always a possibility of new evidence or arguments that could challenge the statement. Therefore, it's not always to be believed with certainty.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

If a statement is plausible, Group of answer choicesyou must always believe ityou should never believe itit is hard to understand because it makes no senseit is believable enough to possibly be true

The following statements are true about values. Which ones are not?Question 3AnswerA.They make one make decisions about write or wrongB.They may be informed by one's backgroundC.They are convictions that we accept to be trueD.They are assumptions that one has about the worldE.They are standards of behaviour or principles

In discussing Closure Principle arguments for scepticism, Fred Dretske suggests that the problem with the closure principle is that it requires us to be able to rule out all of the many things that are incompatible with our claimed knowledge. But this, he suggests, is excessive.Instead, when we are trying to determine whether or not someone is justified in believing something, Dretske suggests that we focus on whether they have reasons to reject all Answer 1 Question 4 alternatives, not all Answer 2 Question 4 alternatives.

An assertion that can be proved or disproved to be consistent with reality is a proposition ofMultiple Choiceopinion.value.policy.fact.

Some decisions have only one alternative and cannot consider steps in decision making.True false question.TrueFalse

1/3

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.