Question 5 of 10In what way are Lau v. Nichols, Mendez v. Westminster, and the Magnuson Act alike?A.They all helped the United States move toward racial equality.B.They all dealt with the question of who can become U.S. citizens.C.They all maintained the need for equal access to education.D.They all ensured the rights of white Americans.

Question 10 of 10Educational rights for minorities were ensured by which of the following?A.The election of President Barack ObamaB.Lau v. NicholsC.The Fourteenth AmendmentD.The Magnuson Act of 1943

In which case did the plaintiffs claim that they were being denied their right to equal protection of the law and that the laws of “separate but equal” were, in fact, not equal?Group of answer choicesDred Scott v. SanfordBrown v. Board of EducationRegents of the University of California v. BakkeStrauder v. West Virginia

The case of Dred Scott v. Sandford held in part:Group of answer choicesthe concept of “separate but equal” was unconstitutional.states could determine whether former slaves could be citizens.freed slaves did not have the right to freedom in territories where slavery was still legal.blacks had equal rights with whites.

Which case dealt with the issue of school segregation and helped advance civil rights? Group of answer choicesC) Miranda v. ArizonaD) Gideon v. WainwrightB) Brown v. Board of EducationA) Roe v. Wade

How did the NAACP fight segregation?A.By fighting inequality in public schoolsB.By proving that railway cars were not equalC.By changing the Plessy v. Ferguson Court decisionD.By proving that New York City was segregated