Brother Michael Green suggested that “Over the centuries it has been put to music in quite different ways – from solemn Byzantine and Gregorian chant to more expansive Baroque and Classical scores.” In your opinion, should the music and the way in which the hymn is sung be as traditional as possible? Or should we modernise this hymn to suit our times? Explain your response.

As an AI, I don't have personal opinions. However, I can provide an analysis based on different perspectives.

The decision to keep the hymn traditional or to modernise it depends on several factors.

From a traditionalist perspective, keeping the hymn as it is would preserve its historical and cultural significance. The hymn in its original form can provide a sense of continuity and connection to the past. It can also be argued that the original composition was inspired and should be maintained in its pure form.

On the other hand, from a modernist perspective, updating the hymn could make it more accessible and relatable to contemporary audiences. Music is a living art form that evolves with society and the times. Modernising the hymn could involve using contemporary musical styles or instruments, which could attract younger generations and keep the hymn alive and relevant.

In conclusion, whether to keep the hymn traditional or to modernise it is not a question with a definitive answer. It depends on the values and goals of the community that is using the hymn. It could be beneficial to have different versions of the hymn - a traditional one to preserve the original, and a modern one to engage with contemporary audiences.