The two limitations of the clientless SSL VPN solution are:

1. It does not support all IP applications: Clientless SSL VPNs are primarily designed to provide access to web-based applications. They may not support all types of IP applications, particularly those that require specific client software or use non-HTTP protocols.

2. It does not support low-latency forwarding and the use of real-time applications: Due to its proxying nature, a clientless SSL VPN may introduce additional latency that can affect the performance of real-time applications like VoIP or video conferencing.

The other options mentioned (cannot traverse most firewall and NAT devices, requires a VPN client software, allows access only from company-managed systems) are not typical limitations of a clientless SSL VPN solution.

Question

The two limitations of the clientless SSL VPN solution are:

1. It does not support all IP applications: Clientless SSL VPNs are primarily designed to provide access to web-based applications. They may not support all types of IP applications, particularly those that require specific client software or use non-HTTP protocols.

2. It does not support low-latency forwarding and the use of real-time applications: Due to its proxying nature, a clientless SSL VPN may introduce additional latency that can affect the performance of real-time applications like VoIP or video conferencing.

The other options mentioned (cannot traverse most firewall and NAT devices, requires a VPN client software, allows access only from company-managed systems) are not typical limitations of a clientless SSL VPN solution.

Knowee AI · Accepted Answer

The two limitations of the clientless SSL VPN solution are:

1. It does not support all IP applications: Clientless SSL VPNs are primarily designed to provide access to web-based applications. They may not support all types of IP applications, particularly those that require specific client software or use non-HTTP protocols.

2. It does not support low-latency forwarding and the use of real-time applications: Due to its proxying nature, a clientless SSL VPN may introduce additional latency that can affect the performance of real-time applications like VoIP or video conferencing.

The other options mentioned (cannot traverse most firewall and NAT devices, requires a VPN client software, allows access only from company-managed systems) are not typical limitations of a clientless SSL VPN solution.

Which two statements are limitations of the clientless SSL VPN solution? (Choose two.)

Question

Solution

Similar Questions

Upgrade your grade with Knowee