Multiple Choice QuestionWhich statement below accurately reflects the minority opinion in the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission? The minority opinion was that Blank______.Multiple choice question.corporations were not meant to be part of the we in "We the People," and thus are not directly protected by the Constitutionalthough corporations did have "personhood," they were not citizens, and thus could not donate to political campaignsthe case should have been thrown out because corporations cannot have legal standing because they cannot truly be hurtNeed help? Review these concept resources.

Multiple Choice QuestionWhich statement below accurately summarizes the majority opinion in the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission? A majority of the Supreme Court justices ruled that Blank______.Multiple choice question.corporations could give to political campaigns but only if the donation was first approved by a shareholder votecorporations are not protected by the Constitution since they are not peoplelaws that limited corporate and union spending on political campaigns were unconstitutionalcorporations could not contribute directly to political campaigns, but they could give money to individuals, who in turn, could contribute the moneyNeed help? Review these concept resources.

What counterargument did the four dissenting justices offer in the case of Citizens United in 2010?Multiple ChoiceThey argued that there was no constitutional provision limiting marriage to only a man and a woman.They insisted that the Court had an obligation to review a president's public statements and use them for context in ruling on his public policy statements.They claimed that the First Amendment allowed for unlimited campaign spending by corporations and unions.They argued that corporations and unions are not what the framers had in mind in when referring to “the people” in the First Amendment.They insisted that if the First Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congress from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens, for simply engaging in political speech.

Multiple Choice QuestionIn the Robert Gilmer v. Interstate Johnson Lane Corporation case, the U.S. Supreme Court held that by agreeing to arbitrate a statutory claim, employees Blank______.Multiple choice question.do not give up the right to litigate the matters related to employmentdo not forgo the substantive rights afforded by the statutegive up the rights afforded by the statuteretain the right to litigate matters related to civil rights claims

Multiple Choice QuestionBlank______ create(s) legal barriers to entry.Multiple choice question.The marketFirmsCompetitorsGovernment

The Citizens United case ________.Question 5Select one:a.upheld existing law limiting spending on behalf of political candidatesb.overturned existing lawc.sent the case back to the lower court to be re-triedd.created more restrictive limits on political spending