Jake wants to carry out his final year project on the STROOP task, in which you show colour words written in congruent and incongruent colours. He has a number of variations of word type that he will use whilst testing reactions times for naming the colour of the font e.g. font type, upper versus lower case. He plans to test each word type in a separate block of trials and then compare the word types in an ANOVA. What issue is he likely to have with his design?Question 14Answera.There are two variables, congruent versus incongruent word-colour combinations, as well as word type, which means the data cannot be analysedb.There will be order effects as the word type is varied in separate blocksc.The participants won't know the words in advance so they can't give informed consentd.There will be a confounding variable of word type, which will affect the results

Stroop interference lessens when: participants are better readers. participants are given more practice at naming colors. participants are girls rather than boys. participants are encouraged to focus carefully.

n many experiments, participants have been shown nonword letter strings, presented very briefly. When asked to identify these strings, participants tend to make specific kinds of errors. How would these errors be best described?Question 18Answera.They are unable to identify any letters if the string is a nonword.b.They identify many of the letters correctly but tend to incorrectly identify the vowels.c.They tend to misidentify strange letter combinations as more-common letter combinations.d.They misidentify more-common letter combinations as less-common letter pairs.Clear my choice

A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was carried out on data from a word recognition task. Participants reaction times were recorded for two word categories for both high and low frequency words (see image). Was there a significant effect of word frequency on reaction times for recognition?Question 10Answera.Yes, there was a significant effect of word frequency on reaction times as F(1, 23) = 24.47, p<.095b.Yes, there was a significant effect of word frequency on reaction times as F(1, 23) = 24.47, p<.001c.Yes, there was a significant effect of word frequency on reaction times as F(23) = 25, p=.051d.No, there is no effect of word frequency on reaction times as p=.095

In many experiments, participants have been shown nonword letter strings, presented very briefly. When asked to identify these strings, participants tend to make specific kinds of errors. How would these errors be best described?Question 18Answera.They are unable to identify any letters if the string is a nonword.b.They identify many of the letters correctly but tend to incorrectly identify the vowels.c.They tend to misidentify strange letter combinations as more-common letter combinations.d.They misidentify more-common letter combinations as less-common letter pairs.

ANOVA testing is used for ...