Write an answer to the Homework Exercise Question using the Legal Analysis Method. This is not a research assignment so I do not want to see articles, or books quoted. This is a practical exercise to get you to write an answer using the legal analysis method and apply the law to a set of facts.  Cases from the textbook and slides can be used, but all cases used, require their relevant citation.  The citation is not the case name but the reference where it can be found: eg Nicaro case (see in referencing below) is found in the year 1999 in Volume 91 of the Australian Law Reports on page 513. In short, the citation is: (1990)  91 ALR 513, only not the case name.  Correct use of referencing is an academic discipline criterion and has been explained above and in the Marking Matrix below. Spacing and Font: 1.5 spacing and Minimum 12 font. Headings can be used, such as "Is the beehive patentable subject matter?". the headings in the question will follow from what the question requires you to answer.  DO NOT USE headings such as; ISSUE, RULE, APPLICATION, AND CONCLUSION  and make lists under these headings. that is not the legal analysis method.Word limit: 1000 words Maximum. No additional 10% over is allowed. Referencing:1. Cases and statutory sections will need to be referenced correctly in your answer. Students in this subject come from various disciplines that use different referencing styles, that do not reference cases or statutes often. So for simplicity, the basic method to reference a case is based on the two most used referencing systems. You either APA or AGLS but not both.Format  APA: (1) in-text citation method APA;(a) for cases - in the text first time a case is mentioned - Nicaro Holdings Pty Ltd v Martin Engineering Co (1990), second and subsequent times Nicaro Holdings case.(b) for statutes and sections- the first time see s 18 (1) Patents Act (1990) (Cth); for subsequent references "s 18(1) of the Act."With APA you will have a Reference List at the end of your assignment that has:Nicaro Holdings Pty Ltd v Martin Engineering Co (1990) 91 ALR 513s 18 (1) Patents Act (1990) (Cth)AGLS or Oxford(2) if you are using footnote methods from Oxford or AGLS;(a) Cases the first time the case appears in text Nicaro Holdings Pty Ltd v Martin Engineering Co; (footnote number) then, in the footnote- only the case citation is given - (1990) 91 ALR 513 appears. If you refer to the case a second time in the answer it appears in the text as Nicaro Holdings Case and the footnote will read; "Nicaro Holdings Pty Ltd v Martin Engineering Co (1990) 91 ALR 513" or see note and give the note number when it previously appeared the first time.b) Acts of Parliament, legislation/statutes and sections- the first time see s 18 (1) (a) Patents Act (1990) (Cth); for subsequent references "s 18(1) of the Act."When using AGLS or Oxford there is no Reference List needed as the notes are at the bottom of the page.This is not a research assignment so I do not want to see articles, or books quoted. This is a practical exercise to get you to write an answer using legal analysis of a set of facts and apply the relevant laws. Cases from the textbook and slides can be used, but all cases used, require their relevant citation.  The citation is not the case name but the reference where it can be found: eg Nicaro case above is found in the year 1999 in Volume 91 of the Australian Law Reports on page 513. In short, the citation is: (1990)  91 ALR 513, only not the case name.  Correct use of referencing is an academic discipline criterion and has been explained above and in the Marking Matrix below. No separate bibliography is required in either referencing system.Penalties for late submission;Faculty Late Submission Penalty is 10% of the value of the assessment after the due date + 10% of the value of the assessment per day after the submission date. So if lodge two days late this is 30% of the total marks lost.