Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] is a foundational case in the area of tort law, specifically negligence, in the UK. Here are the material facts of the case:

1. On August 26, 1928, Mrs. Donoghue (the plaintiff) and a friend went to a café in Paisley, Scotland. Mrs. Donoghue's friend bought her a bottle of ginger beer, which was manufactured by Mr. Stevenson (the defendant).

2. The ginger beer came in an opaque bottle so the contents could not be seen. After Mrs. Donoghue had consumed some of the ginger beer, the remainder of the bottle was poured into her tumbler and a decomposed snail came out of the bottle.

3. Mrs. Donoghue claimed that she suffered from shock and severe gastroenteritis as a result of the incident.

4. Mrs. Donoghue sued Mr. Stevenson for negligence. She could not sue for breach of contract because she did not buy the beer herself.

5. The case eventually reached the House of Lords, where it was held that a manufacturer owes a duty of care to the consumer that their products will not cause harm. This established the modern law of negligence in the UK.

Question

Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] is a foundational case in the area of tort law, specifically negligence, in the UK. Here are the material facts of the case:

1. On August 26, 1928, Mrs. Donoghue (the plaintiff) and a friend went to a café in Paisley, Scotland. Mrs. Donoghue's friend bought her a bottle of ginger beer, which was manufactured by Mr. Stevenson (the defendant).

2. The ginger beer came in an opaque bottle so the contents could not be seen. After Mrs. Donoghue had consumed some of the ginger beer, the remainder of the bottle was poured into her tumbler and a decomposed snail came out of the bottle.

3. Mrs. Donoghue claimed that she suffered from shock and severe gastroenteritis as a result of the incident.

4. Mrs. Donoghue sued Mr. Stevenson for negligence. She could not sue for breach of contract because she did not buy the beer herself.

5. The case eventually reached the House of Lords, where it was held that a manufacturer owes a duty of care to the consumer that their products will not cause harm. This established the modern law of negligence in the UK.

Knowee AI · Accepted Answer

Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] is a foundational case in the area of tort law, specifically negligence, in the UK. Here are the material facts of the case:

1. On August 26, 1928, Mrs. Donoghue (the plaintiff) and a friend went to a café in Paisley, Scotland. Mrs. Donoghue's friend bought her a bottle of ginger beer, which was manufactured by Mr. Stevenson (the defendant).

2. The ginger beer came in an opaque bottle so the contents could not be seen. After Mrs. Donoghue had consumed some of the ginger beer, the remainder of the bottle was poured into her tumbler and a decomposed snail came out of the bottle.

3. Mrs. Donoghue claimed that she suffered from shock and severe gastroenteritis as a result of the incident.

4. Mrs. Donoghue sued Mr. Stevenson for negligence. She could not sue for breach of contract because she did not buy the beer herself.

5. The case eventually reached the House of Lords, where it was held that a manufacturer owes a duty of care to the consumer that their products will not cause harm. This established the modern law of negligence in the UK.

Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] material facts

Question

Solution

Similar Questions

Upgrade your grade with Knowee