When Justice Fortas refers to Keyishian v. Board of Regents in the majority opinion for Tinker v. Des Moines, which kind of reasoning is he using to support his argument?A.Straw manB.Judicial reviewC.PrecedentD.PathosSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

Which of the following decisions is most likely to cite the Supreme Court’s decision in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) as a legal precedent in support of the decision?

What was true about the Supreme Court decision in Tinker v. Des Moines?A.It confirmed that students at school had freedom of speech.B.It said that poor people accused of crimes must have legal representation.C.It confirmed that women should receive equal pay for equal work.D.It said that segregation was unconstitutional.

The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The school district suspended the students, possibly violating their right to free speech.Which best summarizes the dissenting opinion?A.The Des Moines Supreme Court had already ruled in favor of the school to suspend the students.B.There is precedent for schools limiting the rights of students when they anticipate a disruption.C.Because the armbands protested the Vietnam War, the lawsuit was actually a question of Second Amendment rights.D.It was proven that other students were allowed to wear controversial symbols, so their suspension was unconstitutional.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The school district suspended the students, possibly violating their right to free speech.Which best summarizes the dissenting opinion?A.The Des Moines Supreme Court had already ruled in favor of the school to suspend the students.B.It was proven that other students were allowed to wear controversial symbols, so their suspension was unconstitutional.C.There is precedent for schools limiting the rights of students when they anticipate a disruption.D.Because the armbands protested the Vietnam War, the lawsuit was actually a question of Second Amendment right

The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The school district suspended the students, possibly violating their right to free speech.Which best summarizes the majority opinion?A.The case went through the process of judicial review to determine that fear of disruption alone was reason enough to suspend the students.B.There is no precedent for schools to limit the rights of students, so it is unconstitutional to suspend the students for their armbands.C.The Second Amendment guarantees citizens the right to bear arms and form a militia, so they were allowed to express their feelings on the war.D.The First Amendment protects the students' right to wear the armbands; they weren't disruptive, and the school allowed others to wear controversial symbols.