Industrial Smart Wearable (ISW) is essential toIndustry 5.0 since the human worker will play an ever-more essential role in value creation under this para-digm [13]. The proliferation of more intelligent andadvanced industrial wearables would allow workersto perform their tasks safer, faster, and more produc-tively [3]. There is a diverse and growing range ofemerging ISW available to businesses, which offer var-ious functionalities in line with Industry 5.0 objectives.Bio-inspired protective gears and exoskeletons canimprove industrial workers’ capabilities, strength, pro-ductivity, and stability. Head-worn ISWs can enhancehuman operators’ navigation and information-sharingcapabilities, whereas clothing ISWs can use conductiveor optical sensors to monitor and track the vitals of theworkforce [45]. Experts even pursue embedded track-ing ISW that monitors workers’ mental and physicalstrain and stress. Within the Industry 5.0 context, ISWoperates under C-CCP and relies on CAI and IndustrialInternet of Things (IIoT) to communicate and interactwith other facilitating and emerging technologies suchas 3D printers, adaptive-collaborative bots, and auton-omous vehicles [46].

Industry 5.0 for Healthcare 5.0: Opportunities,Challenges and Future Research PossibilitiesL. Gomathi Anand Kumar Mishra Amit Kumar Tyagi[0000−0003−2657−8700]School of Computer Science and Engineering NIIT University Department of Fashion TechnologyVellore Institute of Technology, Chennai Neemrana, India National Institute of Fashion TechnologyChennai, India [email protected] New Delhi, [email protected] [email protected]—Industry 5.0 is the subsequent stage in the developmentof manufacturing and production systems that combines cutting-edgetechnology with human intelligence and skills. The healthcare sectorhas been developing over time, going through significant changes atevery stage. The emerging idea of Industry 5.0 in the healthcare sector,also known as Healthcare 5.0—and its potential applications in thehealthcare sector are examined in this paper. Healthcare 5.0 makes useof cutting-edge technologies to revolutionise healthcare delivery,improve patient outcomes, and improve the healthcare experience as awhole. Industry 5.0 places a strong emphasis on the integration ofhumans, machines, and technology in the manufacturing industry. Thepaper discusses Healthcare 5.0’s potentials and opportunities,including personalised medicine, sophisticated diagnostics,telemedicine, and more patient-centric care, all of which are madepossible by the application of cutting-edge technologies like ArtificialIntelligence (AI), blockchain, big data analytics, and robotics. Thepaper also discusses the difficulties and problems that must be solvedfor Healthcare 5.0 to be implemented successfully, including datasecurity and privacy, ethical and legal issues, the need for appropriateskills and training for healthcare professionals, and cost-effectiveness.Index Terms—Industry 5.0, Healthcare, Artificial Intelligence,Blockchain, Cognitive Systems, Big Data Analytics, HumanCentric,SustainabilityI. INTRODUCTIONBuilding on the first four industrial revolutions [1], Industry5.0 is the most recent manufacturing and industrial sectorevolution. This idea emphasises the significance of humanskills and abilities in manufacturing and production processes.In the late 18th century, mechanisation and steam power gaverise to Industry 1.0, while the assembly line and massproduction was brought about by Industry 2.0 in the early 20thcentury. In the 1970s, industry 3.0 introduced the use ofcomputers and automation; in industry 4.0 [2, 23 and 24], theIndustrial Internet of Things (IIoT), and Artificial Intelligence(AI) emerged along with the widespread adoption of data andconnectivity in the manufacturing sector. Since the firstIndustrial Revolution, advancements in manufacturing havemade manufacturing processes more complex, automatic, andsustainable so that machines can be operated, effectively, andpersistently

In a smart wearable which of the following is likely to be a fundamental, first step, prototype? Circuit engineering prototype Communication prototype Commercial prototype All of the above

The study showed that contrary to Industry 4.0, Industry5.0 appears to be pulled by socio-environmental valuesand needs. Industry 5.0 is the logical continuation ofIndustry 4.0 that draws on commercially mature digitaland operations technologies and emerging disruptivetechnologies such as CAI and adaptive robots to promotehuman-centricity, resilience, and sustainable develop-ment. Industry 5.0 is expected to address the pressingsustainable development concerns by introducing circu-larity into industrial operations, enhancing synergybetween autonomous machines and humans, and regu-lating the pace and quality of digital industrialtransformation.The findings reveal that Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0share similarities but have notable differences. For exam-ple, both frameworks emphasize horizontal integration,which involves integrating different parts of the produc-tion process across the manufacturing supply chains toimprove productivity and reduce costs. Nonetheless, hor-izontal integration under Industry 5.0 goes beyond justintegrating various parts of the manufacturing value net-work. It integrates all stakeholders, including technologyproviders, labor unions, and government regulators, tocreate a seamless and collaborative network to governtechnological advancement. Another significant differ-ence between the two frameworks concerns the techno-logical focus. Although Industry 4.0 was pushed byemerging technologies such as the internet of thingsand cloud computing, these technologies are now com-monplace and considered standard in Industry 5.0.Instead, Industry 5.0 is associated with the emergence ofcognitive technologies that support human-machinesymbioses, such as artificial general intelligence, cognitivecyber-physical systems, and adaptive robots. These tech-nologies enable greater collaboration between humansand machines, and they have the potential to revolutio-nize the way we work and live. Overall, the findings implythat the critical difference between Industry 4.0 andIndustry 5.0 lies in the scope and nature of integrationand the technological properties that drive innovation442 M. GHOBAKHLOO ET AL.and economic values in each framework. While Industry4.0 is merely focused on economic performance, Industry5.0 seeks to balance triple bottom-line considerations byharnessing technology-driven productivity to enhancesocietal values.

In the Industry 4.0 model, the integration of Internet of Things (IoT) and Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) revolutionizes manufacturing processes. Consider a smart factory scenario where all four layers of Industry 4.0 are interconnected and optimized for efficiency.Application Layer (Smart Factory):The smart factory is equipped with advanced sensors and actuators embedded in machinery and production lines.Real-time data collection and analysis enable predictive maintenance and process optimization.Automated workflows manage inventory, production scheduling, and quality control.Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS):CPS components include sensors, actuators, embedded systems, and control algorithms.These systems monitor physical processes, adjust machine parameters, and ensure safety and reliability.CPS coordinates with IoT devices to implement adaptive manufacturing strategies.Internet of Things (IoT):IoT devices such as RFID tags, wearable sensors, and smart tools track assets, monitor environmental conditions, and collect operational data.Cloud-based IoT platforms process massive data streams, apply machine learning algorithms, and facilitate remote monitoring and control.Edge computing devices near production lines provide low-latency processing for time-sensitive applications.Internet Services Layer:Wired and wireless networks connect devices and systems within the smart factory.Cloud and edge computing services support data storage, analytics, and application deployment.Cybersecurity protocols safeguard sensitive information and prevent unauthorized access.Collaboration Between IoT and CPS:The collaboration between IoT and CPS enhances manufacturing capabilities but also introduces certain risks:Benefits:Improved efficiency and productivity through data-driven insights and automation.Enhanced safety measures with real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance.Greater flexibility and adaptability to market demands through agile manufacturing processes.Risks:Cybersecurity vulnerabilities due to increased connectivity and data exchange.Dependency on complex technologies leading to potential system failures or malfunctions.Privacy concerns regarding the collection and usage of sensitive data from IoT devices.In conclusion, the synergistic integration of IoT and CPS in Industry 4.0 facilitates intelligent manufacturing systems but necessitates careful consideration of security and operational challenges.This report provides an overview of a smart factory scenario within the Industry 4.0 framework, highlighting the roles of IoT and CPS components and discussing potential collaborations and risks.

A Multi‑Criteria Decision‑Making Framework to Evaluate the Impactof Industry 5.0 Technologies: Case Study, Lessons Learned, Challengesand Future DirectionsMohamed Abdel‑Basset1 · Rehab Mohamed1 · Victor Chang 2Accepted: 22 January 2024© The Author(s) 2024AbstractSmart technologies have demonstrated striking outcomes regarding the early diagnosis of diseases and the delivery ofthe necessary healthcare in the last decade. However, by emphasizing the core fundamentals of social justice and sustain-ability, together with digitalization and smart technologies that predicate raising productivity and flexibility, Industry5.0 has proven to achieve more efficient results. Industry 5.0 technologies provide more intelligent ways for humanemployees and higher efficiency development while also improving safety and performance in many applications. In thisresearch, the contribution is focused on the healthcare and how Industry 5.0 technologies demonstrate several advantagesfor the healthcare sector, starting with automated and precise disease prediction, moving on to aiding medical personnelin continual surveillance and monitoring and concluding with successful digital automation of smart equipment. Theobjective of this study is to apply a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach under a neutrosophic environmentto evaluate the advantages of industry 5.0 technologies in the healthcare sector. Industry 5.0 primary value is to reachhuman-centric, sustainable, and resilient industries. While Industry 5.0 technologies sub-values regarding the healthcaresector are determined and distinguished according to the 3-main values mentioned previously based on literature. Themethodologies applied in this study are: The Analytical Hierarchy approach (AHP) evaluates the main values and sub-values. Subsequently, the effectiveness of industry 5.0 technologies according to their values to the healthcare sectorare ranked by Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The approach is constructedunder uncertainty based on a neutrosophic environment to achieve accuracy in the evaluation process. The results showthat the most influential technology in healthcare are AI and cloud computing, while nano-technology, drone technology,and robots are at the end of the ranking. While validating the suggested technique, outcome comparisons were carriedout to demonstrate the benefits of the methodologies. A sensitivity study indicates that adjusting the weightings of thesub-values has no significant effect on the ranking of technologies.Keywords Industry 5.0 · Healthcare · Multi-criteria decision-making · AHP · TOPSIS1 IntroductionThe industrial revolution has changed from decade to dec-ade; at the moment, industrial businesses compete globally.Nearly every aspect of human life has been impacted bythe numerous advancements in science and technology.Industry 5.0 has added a unique perspective where, withcutting-edge technology, the industrial market has reacheda level never before attained. The review reveals that Indus-try 4.0 is concentrated on productivity that is powered bytechnology (Ghobakhloo et al., 2022). Based on this, Indus-try 5.0 is conscious of the social and sustainability aspectsthat Industry 4.0 lacks. Whereas industry 5.0 competencies* Victor [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University,Sharqiyah 44519, Egypt2 Department of Operations and Information Management,Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK