Which of the following is not an exception to the warrant requirement?Group of answer choiceshot pursuitexigent circumstancesexclusionary ruleplain-view doctrine

An exception(s) to the Exclusionary Rule is/are:Group of answer choicesProsecution can use evidence seized by police who acted pursuant to a warrant that later was found to be invalid but police reasonably believed the warrant was valid (good faith) AND illegally obtained evidence may be introduced at trial if the prosecutor can show the evidence would have been inevitably obtained in a legal mannerProsecution can use evidence seized by police who acted pursuant to a warrant that later was found to be invalid but police reasonably believed the warrant was valid (good faith)The defendant has committed many similar crimes and the current crime is the same type of crime so evidence can be used at trialIllegally obtained evidence may be introduced at trial if the prosecutor can show the evidence would have been inevitably obtained in a legal manner

The warrant is intended to protect persons fromGroup of answer choicesbad informantsovereager law enforcement behaviorexigent circumstancesall of these

Hot pursuit is an exception to the warrant requirement.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse

What must be established before a warrant may be issued?Group of answer choicesevidence existsguiltwitnesses existprobable cause

A warrant is required for all searches conducted by a government agent.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse