9.  I hold Johnny around the neck with a gun to his head while walking out of a Bank that I just robbed, hoping to avoid being arrested.  This would be which of the following restraint crimes?Group of answer choicesA. False Imprisonment.B. Kidnapping.C. Hostage.D. Criminal Threat.

Arrange the following words in a meaningful sequence.1. Arrest 2. Punishment 3. Prison 4. Crime 5. Judgment

Answer the following questions based on the scenario below: Jim and Bob attended a local bank together. Jim went into the bank and demanded money from the teller. He indicated that he had a gun on him. However, no gun was ever seen or found. Bob sat in a vehicle out front of the bank waiting for Jim. Jim obtained a large sum of money and then proceeded to the vehicle. Bob left the scene with Jim in the passenger seat of his vehicle. Jim and Bob were located in the car a short time later with the money. Both were arrested and charged with Robbery. They were taken to the police station where Bob alleged that he had no idea Jim was robbing the bank...he only thought Jim went in to use the bank machine. Bob and Jim are friends, but Bob agrees to give a statement to the policing implicating Jim in the robbery. The police later attended Jim’s home and were let into the residence by Jim’s roommate Steve. Steve was told about the investigation and he agreed to let the police in to search the residence. On the kitchen table the police located papers containing a plan to rob the bank, and Jim’s cell phone containing photos of the bank that was robbed. The police seized these items and submitted them at the trial as evidence against Jim. At the end of the trial Jim was convicted of the robbery. Prior to sentencing Jim’s lawyer gave a submission to the judge advising the financial difficulties Jim was going through, and suggested a 2 years sentence is appropriate in this situation for Jim. The crown also made a submission advising the judge of Jim’s violent history and lengthy criminal record suggesting he receive 7 years incarceration. An independent report was also prepared by probation services indicating Jim’s pass/history, and comments were given from people involved in Jim’s life. The bank teller also provided a report to the court explaining how the robbery affected her. After taking into consideration all this information the judge sentenced Jim to 7 years in jail (the maximum sentence for a second offence of robbery is 7 year). The judge was particularly harsh with Jim in order to teach him a lesson and because he had several previous robbery convictions. In what court would Jim's trial have taken place? Group of answer choices Trial in the Ontario Court of Justice with a Judge alone Trial in the Superior Court of Justice with a Judge alone Trial in the Superior Court of Justice with a Judge and Jury The accused would have elected the court either Ontario Court of Justice or Superior Court

Answer the following questions based on the scenario below: Jim and Bob attended a local bank together. Jim went into the bank and demanded money from the teller. He indicated that he had a gun on him. However, no gun was ever seen or found. Bob sat in a vehicle out front of the bank waiting for Jim. Jim obtained a large sum of money and then proceeded to the vehicle. Bob left the scene with Jim in the passenger seat of his vehicle. Jim and Bob were located in the car a short time later with the money. Both were arrested and charged with Robbery. They were taken to the police station where Bob alleged that he had no idea Jim was robbing the bank...he only thought Jim went in to use the bank machine. Bob and Jim are friends, but Bob agrees to give a statement to the policing implicating Jim in the robbery. The police later attended Jim’s home and were let into the residence by Jim’s roommate Steve. Steve was told about the investigation and he agreed to let the police in to search the residence. On the kitchen table the police located papers containing a plan to rob the bank, and Jim’s cell phone containing photos of the bank that was robbed. The police seized these items and submitted them at the trial as evidence against Jim. At the end of the trial Jim was convicted of the robbery. Prior to sentencing Jim’s lawyer gave a submission to the judge advising the financial difficulties Jim was going through, and suggested a 2 years sentence is appropriate in this situation for Jim. The crown also made a submission advising the judge of Jim’s violent history and lengthy criminal record suggesting he receive 7 years incarceration. An independent report was also prepared by probation services indicating Jim’s pass/history, and comments were given from people involved in Jim’s life. The bank teller also provided a report to the court explaining how the robbery affected her. After taking into consideration all this information the judge sentenced Jim to 7 years in jail (the maximum sentence for a second offence of robbery is 7 year). The judge was particularly harsh with Jim in order to teach him a lesson and because he had several previous robbery convictions. The crown is attempting to have the maximum punishment applied to Jim. What factors would he/she present to the courts? Group of answer choices Aggravating Factors Mitigating Factors Probation Report Character references from friends and family members of Jim

Which of the following crimes are not usually considered when people think of crime?Question 12Select one:Car theftMurderRobberyWhite-collar crime

A ............. someone who uses violence when they steal from you in the street. a) thief b) mugger c) shoplifter d) pickpocket