Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

You configured a site-to-site VPN on your Cisco Firepower NGFW, but the CLI output does not show any IKE SA being established. What would you do as the first troubleshooting step?Verify if IPsec proposal matches on both peers.Check if interesting traffic is reaching the crypto engine using Packet Capture.Check if interesting traffic is reaching the crypto engine using Packet Tracer.Check if interesting traffic is reaching the crypto engine by examining connection events.

Question

You configured a site-to-site VPN on your Cisco Firepower NGFW, but the CLI output does not show any IKE SA being established. What would you do as the first troubleshooting step?Verify if IPsec proposal matches on both peers.Check if interesting traffic is reaching the crypto engine using Packet Capture.Check if interesting traffic is reaching the crypto engine using Packet Tracer.Check if interesting traffic is reaching the crypto engine by examining connection events.

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

The first troubleshooting step you should take if the CLI output does not show any IKE SA being established on your Cisco Firepower NGFW is:

Check if interesting traffic is reaching the crypto engine using Packet Tracer.

Here's why:

  1. Packet Tracer is a tool on Cisco devices that allows you to simulate and analyze network traffic. By using Packet Tracer, you can verify if the traffic that should be protected by the VPN (interesting traffic) is actually reaching the crypto engine, which is responsible for encrypting and decrypting the traffic.

  2. While verifying if the IPsec proposal matches on both peers is an important step in troubleshooting VPN issues, it's not the first step you should take if no IKE SA is being established. The IKE SA is established before the IPsec SA, so if there's an issue with the IKE SA, it's likely not related to the IPsec proposal.

  3. Packet Capture is another tool that can be used to analyze network traffic, but it's not as immediate or interactive as Packet Tracer. It's better suited for capturing and analyzing large amounts of traffic over a period of time.

  4. Examining connection events can provide useful information about the traffic flowing through the device, but it's not as direct or specific as using Packet Tracer to check if the interesting traffic is reaching the crypto engine.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

You configured site-to-site VPNs on your two Cisco ASA appliances. However, the IKE SA is not being established between the peers. Which two options could be the causes? (Choose two.)You did not specify the same DH group on both peers.You did not specify the same PSK on both peers.You did not specify matching transform sets on the peers.You did not specify the traffic to be protected by the VPN.

Which statement regarding routing support for IPsec VPNs on Cisco Firepower NGFW is correct?BGP is supported for crypto map-based IPsec VPN.OSPF is supported for VTI-based IPsec VPN.EIGRP is supported for VTI-based IPsec VPN.RRI is supported for crypto map-based IPsec VPN.

Which option about IPsec VPNs on the Cisco FMC is correct?supports asymmetric authentication with IKEv2uses a concept of a VPN topology to configure all required IPsec components on managed devicesuses a concept of tunnel groups for VPN configurationuses the Cisco ASA appliance engine

Which Cisco VPN solution requires use of IKEv2?

rue or False - When a site-to-site VPN is used, IPSec is responsible for the transport of user data.Question 17Select one:TrueFalse

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.