In Gibbons v. Ogden, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the federal government had the right to regulate which type of commerce during peacetime?Multiple choice question.slaveinternationalinterstateintrastate
Question
In Gibbons v. Ogden, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the federal government had the right to regulate which type of commerce during peacetime?Multiple choice question.slaveinternationalinterstateintrastate
Solution
In Gibbons v. Ogden, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the federal government had the right to regulate interstate commerce during peacetime.
Similar Questions
The Gibbons v. Ogden case (1824) gave Chief Justice Marshall the chance to define the right to ______, the greatest power of the federal government in peacetime.Multiple choice question.appeal to the judiciaryregulate interstate commerceregulate the sale of armsform a standing army
John Marshall's focus in Supreme Court cases was toMultiple choice question.enforce a strict interpretation of the Constitution.restrict business competition by allowing the expansion of monopolies.both support private property and provide for the federal government to be active in the economy.uphold states' rights in the face of the continued expansion of federal government power.
The Supreme Court opinion in Dred Scott v. Sandford asserted which of the following?Group of answer choicesCongress could outlaw slavery in the new territories, but any slaves who escaped had to be returned to their ownersCongress had misinterpreted the intentions of the Framers and slave owners should be allowed to import more slaves from overseasAfrican Americans were citizens under the Constitution and those who escaped did not have to be returned to their ownersAfrican Americans were not citizens under the Constitution and Congress could not outlaw slavery
The case of Dred Scott v. Sandford held in part:Group of answer choicesthe concept of “separate but equal” was unconstitutional.states could determine whether former slaves could be citizens.freed slaves did not have the right to freedom in territories where slavery was still legal.blacks had equal rights with whites.
In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, the Supreme Court ruled that:A.slavery could not be practiced in any new states or territories.B.African Americans had no legal rights in the United States.C.the legality of slavery should be left up to state governments.D.states had the right to ignore federal laws they opposed.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.