Among the excavated artifacts from the ancient city of Mohenjo-Daro are small statues of a male figure in a seated position, surrounded by animals. Some researchers have proposed that this figure represents a deity, given its frequent appearance and the reverence animals usually symbolize. However, historian Emily Smith argues that animals were often depicted as companions or symbols of power in this civilization. The fact that animals are shown near the male figure, therefore, ______14Mark for ReviewABCWhich choice most logically completes the text?Awould be unexplainable if the figure is not a deity.Bimplies that the male figure was a powerful ruler.Cnegates the possibility that the figure is a deity.Dis not definitive proof that the figure is a deity.

To answer the question step by step:

1. Understand the context: The passage discusses artifacts from Mohenjo-Daro, specifically small statues of a male figure surrounded by animals. Researchers have different interpretations of what these statues represent.

2. Identify the main argument: Some researchers propose that the male figure represents a deity because of its frequent appearance and the reverence animals symbolize. However, historian Emily Smith offers a different perspective, suggesting that animals were often depicted as companions or symbols of power.

3. Analyze the options:

   • Option A: "would be unexplainable if the figure is not a deity." This option suggests that the presence of animals can only be explained if the figure is a deity, which contradicts Emily Smith's argument.
   • Option B: "implies that the male figure was a powerful ruler." This option aligns with Emily Smith's argument that animals symbolize power, suggesting the figure could be a ruler.
   • Option C: "negates the possibility that the figure is a deity." This option is too strong and dismisses the possibility entirely, which is not supported by the passage.
   • Option D: "is not definitive proof that the figure is a deity." This option aligns with the idea that while the presence of animals could suggest the figure is a deity, it is not conclusive proof, which fits with the overall argument.

4. Choose the most logical option: Based on the analysis, the most logical choice is Option D: "is not definitive proof that the figure is a deity." This option acknowledges the possibility without making a definitive claim, aligning with the nuanced argument presented in the passage.