A defective contract because it is entered into in the name of anotherwithout or in excess of authority, or it is verbal is:*1 pointunenforceablerescissiblevoidvoidable

A defective contract because it is entered into in the name of another without or in excess of authority, or it is verbal can be categorized as one of the following:

1. Unenforceable: This means that although the contract exists, it cannot be enforced by a court of law due to certain legal reasons. For example, if the contract is not in writing as required by law, it may be considered unenforceable.

2. Rescissible: This refers to a contract that is valid and enforceable, but can be canceled or rescinded by one of the parties involved due to certain legal grounds. For instance, if one party was induced into the contract through fraud or misrepresentation, they may have the right to rescind the contract.

3. Void: A void contract is one that is considered to have no legal effect from the beginning. It is as if the contract never existed. This can occur if the contract is entered into by someone without the proper authority or if the contract is against the law.

4. Voidable: A voidable contract is one that is initially valid and enforceable, but can be voided or canceled by one of the parties involved due to certain legal reasons. For example, if one party was under duress or lacked capacity to enter into the contract, they may have the option to void the contract.

It is important to note that the specific categorization of a defective contract may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case.