The link between watching violent TV and behaving aggressively is complex because it is possible that: Higher levels of aggressive behaviour are associated with a preference for watching violent TV. We don't have a reliable way to measure violent behaviour. We don't have a reliable and ethical way to manipulate exposure to violent TV shows. Non-aggressive kids don't tend to watch much TV and so you can't make a fair comparison.
Question
The link between watching violent TV and behaving aggressively is complex because it is possible that:
Higher levels of aggressive behaviour are associated with a preference for watching violent TV.
We don't have a reliable way to measure violent behaviour.
We don't have a reliable and ethical way to manipulate exposure to violent TV shows.
Non-aggressive kids don't tend to watch much TV and so you can't make a fair comparison.
Solution 1
The link between watching violent TV and behaving aggressively is indeed complex due to several factors:
-
Higher levels of aggressive behaviour are associated with a preference for watching violent TV: This suggests that individuals who already exhibit aggressive behaviour may be more inclined to watch violent TV, rather than violent TV causing aggressive behaviour. This is a classic case of the "chicken or the egg" dilemma, making it difficult to establish a clear cause-and-effect relationship.
-
We don't have a reliable way to measure violent behaviour: Without a reliable measure, it's challenging to accurately assess the impact of violent TV on aggressive behaviour. Different studies may use different definitions or measures of "violent behaviour", leading to inconsistent findings.
-
We don't have a reliable and ethical way to manipulate exposure to violent TV shows: Ethical guidelines prevent researchers from exposing participants to potentially harmful content just for the sake of an experiment. This makes it hard to conduct experimental studies that could provide more definitive evidence of a causal link.
-
Non-aggressive kids don't tend to watch much TV and so you can't make a fair comparison: If non-aggressive kids watch less TV overall, then they would naturally be exposed to less violent content. This could skew the results, making it appear as though watching violent TV leads to aggressive behaviour when in fact, the relationship may be due to other factors (like overall TV watching time).
In conclusion, while there may be a correlation between watching violent TV and aggressive behaviour, it's difficult to establish a direct causal link due to these complexities.
Solution 2
The link between watching violent TV and behaving aggressively is indeed complex due to several factors:
-
Higher levels of aggressive behaviour are associated with a preference for watching violent TV: This suggests that individuals who already exhibit aggressive behaviour may be more inclined to watch violent TV, rather than violent TV causing aggressive behaviour. This is a classic case of correlation not implying causation.
-
We don't have a reliable way to measure violent behaviour: This makes it difficult to accurately assess the impact of violent TV on aggressive behaviour. Without a reliable measure, we cannot definitively say that watching violent TV leads to aggressive behaviour.
-
We don't have a reliable and ethical way to manipulate exposure to violent TV shows: Ethical guidelines prevent researchers from exposing participants to potentially harmful content, such as violent TV shows, just to observe the effects. This makes it challenging to conduct experiments that could provide more definitive answers.
-
Non-aggressive kids don't tend to watch much TV and so you can't make a fair comparison: If non-aggressive kids are less likely to watch TV in general, then comparing their behaviour to that of kids who watch violent TV may not yield meaningful results. This could be due to other factors, such as differences in parenting styles or access to TV.
In conclusion, while there may be a correlation between watching violent TV and aggressive behaviour, it is difficult to establish a direct causal link due to these complexities.
Similar Questions
Using a cross-lagged-panel correlational procedure, Eron, Huesmann, Letkowitz, and Walder (1972) found evidence which suggests thatQuestion 6Answera.watching violent TV programs may produce later aggression.b.people who watch violent TV programs when they are young continue to do so all of their lives.c.aggressive people tend to watch nonviolent TV programs.d.aggressive third graders watch violent TV programs when they grow up.
According to the class lecture material, which cause-and-effect conclusion, if any, can we draw from the correlational studies of watching violent television? behaviors.Group of answer choicesA. Watching violence on television causes aggressive behavior.B. Watching violence on television reduces aggressive behavior.C. Watching violence on television has no effect on aggressiveD. We can draw none of these conclusions.
Make an opinion about the children at age 10 who mimic risky behaviors they see on TV.
Although there is a biological basis for aggression: We do not understand when people might become aggressive. No person is inevitably aggressive - social factors and patterns of thinking are important. Aggression is still primarily a problem of having "a bad personality". There is no evidence that we inherit violent tendencies, such as a violent temper or anti-social behaviour.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12, 353–359. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00366 What is this?
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.