Explain what the phrase "Kill the Indian, save the man" in paragraph 6 most likely means. Describe the effects of this phrase's particular word choice and use evidence from the text in your answer.
Question
Explain what the phrase "Kill the Indian, save the man" in paragraph 6 most likely means. Describe the effects of this phrase's particular word choice and use evidence from the text in your answer.
Solution 1
Sure, to answer the question step by step, let's break it down:
-
Understanding the Phrase:
- The phrase "Kill the Indian, save the man" is historically associated with the assimilation policies directed at Native Americans, particularly in the context of Indian boarding schools in the United States.
- The phrase implies that in order to "save" Native Americans, their indigenous identity, culture, and traditions must be eradicated or "killed."
-
Analyzing the Word Choice:
- The word "kill" is very strong and violent, suggesting a forceful and aggressive approach to eradicating Native American culture.
- "Save the man" implies that there is something inherently valuable in the individual that can only be preserved by removing their cultural identity.
-
Effects of the Word Choice:
- The juxtaposition of "kill" and "save" creates a stark contrast, highlighting the perceived necessity of cultural destruction for the sake of individual salvation.
- This word choice reflects the paternalistic and ethnocentric attitudes of the time, where Western culture was seen as superior and indigenous cultures were viewed as obstacles to progress and civilization.
-
Using Evidence from the Text:
- To fully support this analysis, you would need to refer to specific parts of the text where this phrase is used or where the effects of such assimilation policies are described.
- Look for descriptions of the boarding school experiences, testimonies from Native Americans who went through these programs, or any historical context provided in the text that illustrates the impact of these policies.
-
Conclusion:
- Summarize how the phrase "Kill the Indian, save the man" encapsulates the destructive assimilation policies aimed at Native Americans.
- Emphasize the lasting effects of these policies on Native American communities, including loss of language, culture, and identity.
By following these steps, you can provide a comprehensive answer that explains the meaning of the phrase, analyzes its word choice, and uses evidence from the text to support your explanation.
Solution 2
Sure, to answer the question step by step, let's break it down:
-
Understanding the Phrase:
- The phrase "Kill the Indian, save the man" is historically associated with the assimilation policies directed at Native Americans, particularly in the context of Indian boarding schools in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
- The phrase implies that in order to "save" Native Americans, their indigenous identity, culture, and traditions must be eradicated ("killed") so that they can be transformed into what was considered a "civilized" person by Euro-American standards.
-
Analyzing the Word Choice:
- "Kill": This is a very strong and violent word, suggesting complete eradication or destruction. It implies that the Native American identity is something harmful or undesirable that must be completely removed.
- "Indian": This term refers to the indigenous people of America, but in this context, it is used to represent their cultural and social identity.
- "Save": This word suggests rescue or salvation, implying that the person is in a state of needing help or improvement.
- "Man": This term is used to denote a human being, but in this context, it implies a person who conforms to the Euro-American cultural norms and values.
-
Effects of the Word Choice:
- The juxtaposition of "kill" and "save" creates a stark contrast, highlighting the perceived necessity of destroying one identity to preserve another.
- The phrase dehumanizes Native American culture by suggesting it is something that needs to be eradicated for the individual to be "saved."
- It reflects the ethnocentric and paternalistic attitudes of the time, where Euro-American culture was seen as superior and the only way to be truly "human."
-
Using Evidence from the Text:
- To support this analysis, you would need to refer to specific parts of the text where this phrase is used or where the effects of such assimilation policies are discussed.
- Look for descriptions of the boarding school experiences, testimonies from Native Americans who went through these programs, or any historical context provided in the text that explains the rationale behind these policies.
-
Constructing the Answer:
- Begin by explaining the historical context of the phrase.
- Analyze the specific word choices and their implications.
- Discuss the broader effects of these policies on Native American communities.
- Use direct quotes or paraphrased content from the text to support your points.
Here is a sample response:
The phrase "Kill the Indian, save the man" most likely means that in order to "save" Native Americans, their indigenous identity, culture, and traditions must be eradicated so that they can be transformed into what was considered a "civilized" person by Euro-American standards. The word "kill" suggests a violent and complete eradication, while "Indian" refers to the indigenous identity. "Save" implies rescue or improvement, and "man" denotes a person who conforms to Euro-American norms.
This word choice dehumanizes Native American culture, suggesting it is something harmful that must be destroyed. It reflects the ethnocentric and paternalistic attitudes of the time, where Euro-American culture was seen as superior. The effects of this phrase are evident in the harsh assimilation policies, such as Indian boarding schools, where Native American children were forced to abandon their language, traditions, and identities.
For example, in the text, it is mentioned that children were punished for speaking their native languages and were taught to adopt Euro-American customs. This demonstrates the destructive impact of the phrase's ideology, as it led to the loss of cultural heritage and identity for many Native Americans.
Similar Questions
Review the text in bold.If the white man wants to live in peace with the Indian he can live in peace. There need be no trouble. Treat all men alike. Give them all the same law. Give them all an even chance to live and grow. All men were made by the same Great Spirit Chief. They are all brothers. The earth is the mother of all people, and all people should have equal rights upon it. You might as well expect the rivers to run backward as that any man who was born a free man should be contented when penned up and denied liberty to go where he pleases. If you tie a horse to a stake, do you expect he will grow fat? If you pen an Indian up on a small spot of earth, and compel him to stay there, he will not be contented, nor will he grow and prosper. I only ask of the Government to be treated as all other men are treated.We ask that the same law shall work alike on all men. If the Indian breaks the law, punish him by the law. If the white man breaks the law, punish him also. . . .Whenever the white man treats the Indian as they treat each other, then we will have no more wars. We shall all be alike—brothers of one father and one mother, with one sky above us and country around us, and one government for all. For this time the Indian race are waiting and praying.Adapted from Chief Joseph, "An Indian's View of Indian Affairs"In the text in bold, what rhetorical strategy does Chief Joseph use?He uses a call to action.He makes a comparison.He uses repetition.He exaggerates a point.Submit
Using the information from the sources, draw a mind map showing the factors leading to the destruction oftraditional Indian life.
On the Way to the MissionNote: This essay is a historical document that contains the word “Indian” in reference to people Indigenous to North America. In earlier times, this was considered an acceptable term for referring to Indigenous people, but today the term is outdated and inappropriate unless reading directly from a historical document or work of literature. Any questions related to this passage will use more appropriate terminology unless it is directly quoting the passage.They dogged him all one afternoonThrough the bright snow,Two white men, servants of greed;He knew that they were there,But he turned not his head;He was an Indian trapper;He planted his snow-shoes firmly,He dragged the long tobogganWithout rest.The three figures driftedLike shadows in the mind of a seer;The snow-shoes were the whisperersOn the threshold of awe;The toboggan made the sound of wings,A wood pigeon sloping to her nest.The Indian’s face was calm,He strode with the sorrow of fore-knowledge.But his eyes were jewels of contentSet in circles of peace.They would have shot him;But momently in the deep forest,They saw something flit by his side;Their hearts stopped with fear.Then the moon rose.They would have left him to the spirit,But they saw the long tobogganRounded well with furs,With many a silver fox-skin,With the pelts of mink and otter,They were the servants of greed;When the moon grew brighterAnd the spruces were dark with sleet.They shot him.When he fell on a shield of moonlightOne of his arms clung to his burden;The snow was not melted:The spirit passed away—Then the servants of greedTore off the cover to count their gains;They shuddered away into the shadows,Hearing each the loud heart of the other,Silence was born.There in the tender moonlight,As sweet as they were in life,Glimmered the ivory featuresOf the Indian’s wife.In the manner of Montagnais womenHer hair was rolled with braid;Under her waxen fingersA crucifix was laid.He was drawing her down to the mission,To bury her there in the spring,When the blood root comes and the windflowerTo silver everything.But as a gift of plunderSide by side were they laid,The moon went on with her settingAnd covered them with shade.—by D. C. ScottThe phrase “A wood pigeon sloping to her nest” contains an example ofasimile bmetaphorcalliteration dpersonification
‘Deep & sensitive’ objectives must be captured as per the new Indian land war doctrine.Select one:TrueFalse
“Is distinct cultural identity the primary cause of insurgency in the North-eastern region of India”.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.